Controlled demolition in Vancouver, the Marine Building -
perfectly executed
Didn't want to be alone so went too, World Trade 7 -
perfectly executed
Saturday, March 29, 2014
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
Flight Fantasies?
Somewhere, within 2.97 million square miles. Kuala Lumpur to Beijing.
227 passengers and 12 crew. A Boeing 777 disappeared without a trace.
And the largest search in history is underway.
And there are questions everywhere.
The Pilot of flight 370 had a Flight Simulator in his home. Some pilots do to acquaint themselves with any unfamiliar airports, perhaps on a new route assignment. Not uncommon or suspicious. But could that Flight Simulator have been used by someone unbeknownst to this pilot? Could it have been used over a period of time without detection? To teach someone? Could it have been used to plan a route to a secret destination? Some routes were deleted from the hard drive.
Is it credible to suspect a larger conspiracy here? That includes human intervention?
Could a flight sim be run by a thumb drive for instance, so the
information taken off it be sidestepped from the recording hard drive?
Pilot and co-pilot so far show no signs of suspicious activity preflight or since. (except for one photo I saw where the Captain wore a Tshirt saying 'Democracy is dead') And what about the other 10 on the flight crew? How much investigation is being done there? What about passengers? We know two Iranian men were aboard with stolen passports? Where were they really going? Who else could have been flying undetected?
Would the plan have been to steal a whole plane? To be used for what? Filled with explosives and sent to a target? Even loaded with a nuclear weapon and aimed at a whole city? Israel is currently on high alert for incoming aircraft. Who else should be frightened? Where would that attack come from?
Would it be possible to add fuel to the 777 without it being ordered by the pilot? Could someone on a ground crew be involved? Was a longer flight planned? To where?
Could someone on the flight crew be involved? Someone who could use the keypad to get into the cockpit? Or an attendant just bringing tea and finger cakes followed by an accomplice?
Once the cockpit is accessed, a trained killer let in by that conspirator on the crew, could easily murder the two pilots in seconds, before they could send any signal about highjacking or even speak an emergency word. Or a distress call. Then the perpetrator could easily have sent that, 'alright, good night' voice message.
A simple reprogramming of the flight plan coordinates takes less than another minute. Then that hard left turn and heading into oblivion. Turning off the transponder is seconds. Satellites have set an arc based on the last signals from the plane.
But a human had to have been flying the plane, changing its direction. They know it crossed back over Malaysian territory, into the Straight of Malacca. Then to avoid flying over North Sumatra, it would have had to adjust direction again, northwest, to avoid Indonesia, then another hard left turn for a south heading into the vast Indian Ocean!
IF, that is where it went?
The airplane descended to 10,000 feet, to avoid certain radars? Known as terrain masking. And shorty after ascends to 45,000 feet, (military height?) and high above the recommended altitude for a Boeing 777, perhaps neutralizing all the passengers trapped in the cocoon? The fact is that the passengers may have been blissfully unaware of any of these altitude or directional changes.
Searchers are now everywhere along that huge arc. But only in the south ocean. And it seems like there is simply nowhere to go. Nothing much down there until you get to Antarctica and then only penguins. But the north is much more interesting. Yes?
Consider this:
If the aircraft follows a route west along the equator, instead of turning south, perhaps out of range of Northern Hemisphere radar, it could easily at some point turn northward again over the Arabian Sea and head for where? Oman? Somalia? Iran? Yemen? Pakistan? Even America's supposed friend, Saudi Arabia.
Virtually all of those countries have been connected to terrorist activities, either by open support financially or training facilities or harboring fugitives. And most of them have tacit approval of certain factions at work within their countries which is seen as deception by the West. Pakistan being at the head of the list. And Pakistan already has nuclear weapons.
So what happens next? The ground crew of this conspiracy is waiting for the landing in whatever country? Perhaps still piloted by a terrified captain? Crew is ready to hide the stolen aircraft in a secluded hangar secure from spying satellites? Local people would hear it or even see it. But would people in any of those countries speak out about a mysterious airplane landing in the night? Why would it be mysterious? Do people know commercial flight schedules except when they are flying themselves? Is there anything appearing suspicious about a commercial airliner arriving? People just keep their mouths shut in these places.
Whatever
the purpose of Malaysian Flight 370 flying off into nowhere, it could
be someone activating a carefully and brilliantly thought out plan,
maybe in the making for years.
If so we have all the more reason to be alarmed.
Nothing is too radical.
Human intervention brings to mind only another question: Who do we trust?
Nothing is too radical.
addenda: Mar 26. A French satellite has spotted what appears to be many pieces of debris in the South Indian Ocean. Australian ships are heading there to identify it now. After many false alarms, and thousands of private searchers using Tomnod and seeing thousands of UFOs, (Unidentified Floating Objects) in the vast ocean, could any of it be the remains of MH370?
So far nothing discounts my theory of a stolen plane by persons unknown And the suspicion of a false flag operation lingers.
addenda: Apr 18. Even though there has been some suggestion about this flight moving toward Diego Garcia, it seems like the MSM is quick to discard it. But if this plane WAS heading to that atoll for a landing, it would certainly be shot down before it got close and IF that was the action taken, there would be extensive measures to cover up an action that took the lives of hundreds of passengers. And where it might have really gone down.
However, there is still the scenario that those on Diego Garcia knew it was coming and what it may have contained. In which case any action would still be shrouded in utmost secrecy. The passengers disposed of, and whatever agents or precious cargo aboard, taken off and disappeared.
addenda Dec 15. Facts continue to emerge. Especially the one which now says that the Malaysian Government didn't want to know about radar tracking of the flight? Their delay and lack of interest in the information is fueling the fire of conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of MH370. Conspiracy theories include hijacking, attacks from extremist groups, cockpit fire, and that the Malaysian Airline plane that was shot down in Ukraine was actually MH370 and not MH17!
But this 5 day delay spawns yet another theory. That a certain time was needed to substitute another aircraft for MH370. IF MH370 was destined secretly to fly to Diego Garcia, for instance, another plane could easily have taken over the transponder codes and signals to imitate MH370, from it's perceived route south after passing through the Malacca Strait and simply flew into the Indian Ocean before turning all electronics off and going elsewhere, all the while a radar silent MH370 lands on Diego Garcia and is quickly hidden. With the secret military cargo that the Chinese thought they were getting from Malaysia.
And there are questions everywhere.
The Pilot of flight 370 had a Flight Simulator in his home. Some pilots do to acquaint themselves with any unfamiliar airports, perhaps on a new route assignment. Not uncommon or suspicious. But could that Flight Simulator have been used by someone unbeknownst to this pilot? Could it have been used over a period of time without detection? To teach someone? Could it have been used to plan a route to a secret destination? Some routes were deleted from the hard drive.
Is it credible to suspect a larger conspiracy here? That includes human intervention?
Could a flight sim be run by a thumb drive for instance, so the
information taken off it be sidestepped from the recording hard drive? Pilot and co-pilot so far show no signs of suspicious activity preflight or since. (except for one photo I saw where the Captain wore a Tshirt saying 'Democracy is dead') And what about the other 10 on the flight crew? How much investigation is being done there? What about passengers? We know two Iranian men were aboard with stolen passports? Where were they really going? Who else could have been flying undetected?
Would the plan have been to steal a whole plane? To be used for what? Filled with explosives and sent to a target? Even loaded with a nuclear weapon and aimed at a whole city? Israel is currently on high alert for incoming aircraft. Who else should be frightened? Where would that attack come from?
Would it be possible to add fuel to the 777 without it being ordered by the pilot? Could someone on a ground crew be involved? Was a longer flight planned? To where?
Could someone on the flight crew be involved? Someone who could use the keypad to get into the cockpit? Or an attendant just bringing tea and finger cakes followed by an accomplice?
Once the cockpit is accessed, a trained killer let in by that conspirator on the crew, could easily murder the two pilots in seconds, before they could send any signal about highjacking or even speak an emergency word. Or a distress call. Then the perpetrator could easily have sent that, 'alright, good night' voice message.
A simple reprogramming of the flight plan coordinates takes less than another minute. Then that hard left turn and heading into oblivion. Turning off the transponder is seconds. Satellites have set an arc based on the last signals from the plane.
But a human had to have been flying the plane, changing its direction. They know it crossed back over Malaysian territory, into the Straight of Malacca. Then to avoid flying over North Sumatra, it would have had to adjust direction again, northwest, to avoid Indonesia, then another hard left turn for a south heading into the vast Indian Ocean!
IF, that is where it went?
The airplane descended to 10,000 feet, to avoid certain radars? Known as terrain masking. And shorty after ascends to 45,000 feet, (military height?) and high above the recommended altitude for a Boeing 777, perhaps neutralizing all the passengers trapped in the cocoon? The fact is that the passengers may have been blissfully unaware of any of these altitude or directional changes.
Searchers are now everywhere along that huge arc. But only in the south ocean. And it seems like there is simply nowhere to go. Nothing much down there until you get to Antarctica and then only penguins. But the north is much more interesting. Yes?
Consider this:
If the aircraft follows a route west along the equator, instead of turning south, perhaps out of range of Northern Hemisphere radar, it could easily at some point turn northward again over the Arabian Sea and head for where? Oman? Somalia? Iran? Yemen? Pakistan? Even America's supposed friend, Saudi Arabia.
Virtually all of those countries have been connected to terrorist activities, either by open support financially or training facilities or harboring fugitives. And most of them have tacit approval of certain factions at work within their countries which is seen as deception by the West. Pakistan being at the head of the list. And Pakistan already has nuclear weapons.
So what happens next? The ground crew of this conspiracy is waiting for the landing in whatever country? Perhaps still piloted by a terrified captain? Crew is ready to hide the stolen aircraft in a secluded hangar secure from spying satellites? Local people would hear it or even see it. But would people in any of those countries speak out about a mysterious airplane landing in the night? Why would it be mysterious? Do people know commercial flight schedules except when they are flying themselves? Is there anything appearing suspicious about a commercial airliner arriving? People just keep their mouths shut in these places.
Whatever
the purpose of Malaysian Flight 370 flying off into nowhere, it could
be someone activating a carefully and brilliantly thought out plan,
maybe in the making for years.If so we have all the more reason to be alarmed.
Nothing is too radical.
Human intervention brings to mind only another question: Who do we trust?
Nothing is too radical.
addenda: Mar 26. A French satellite has spotted what appears to be many pieces of debris in the South Indian Ocean. Australian ships are heading there to identify it now. After many false alarms, and thousands of private searchers using Tomnod and seeing thousands of UFOs, (Unidentified Floating Objects) in the vast ocean, could any of it be the remains of MH370?
So far nothing discounts my theory of a stolen plane by persons unknown And the suspicion of a false flag operation lingers.
addenda: Apr 18. Even though there has been some suggestion about this flight moving toward Diego Garcia, it seems like the MSM is quick to discard it. But if this plane WAS heading to that atoll for a landing, it would certainly be shot down before it got close and IF that was the action taken, there would be extensive measures to cover up an action that took the lives of hundreds of passengers. And where it might have really gone down.
However, there is still the scenario that those on Diego Garcia knew it was coming and what it may have contained. In which case any action would still be shrouded in utmost secrecy. The passengers disposed of, and whatever agents or precious cargo aboard, taken off and disappeared.
addenda Dec 15. Facts continue to emerge. Especially the one which now says that the Malaysian Government didn't want to know about radar tracking of the flight? Their delay and lack of interest in the information is fueling the fire of conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of MH370. Conspiracy theories include hijacking, attacks from extremist groups, cockpit fire, and that the Malaysian Airline plane that was shot down in Ukraine was actually MH370 and not MH17!
But this 5 day delay spawns yet another theory. That a certain time was needed to substitute another aircraft for MH370. IF MH370 was destined secretly to fly to Diego Garcia, for instance, another plane could easily have taken over the transponder codes and signals to imitate MH370, from it's perceived route south after passing through the Malacca Strait and simply flew into the Indian Ocean before turning all electronics off and going elsewhere, all the while a radar silent MH370 lands on Diego Garcia and is quickly hidden. With the secret military cargo that the Chinese thought they were getting from Malaysia.
Sunday, March 2, 2014
Smile, GCHQ is watching you
Even doing sexy things in front of your webcam?
No, not me, don't worry I turned it off.
Yes, worry, that doesn't make a difference, they can turn it on again without the little telltale light! They ARE watching you!
It used to be that encouraging someone to tape up their webcam to keep the government from watching would sound like the paranoid advice of a conspiracy loon. Well, it might be time to bust out that tinfoil hat. In another discomforting development concerning governmental snooping, the Guardian has revealed that British Intelligence agency GCHQ, in cooperation with our friends at the NSA, have been watching and recording the webcam images of millions upon millions of users of Yahoo’s video chat service.The program, called Optic Nerve, was started in 2008 and remained active into 2012, according to documents leaked by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. The bulk images include many of a sexual nature, which the documents reveal were hard to keep GCHQ staffers from gawking at. The NSA has restrictions (for what that’s worth) on the kind of data they can gather on American citizens, but the GCHQ has no such restrictions, meaning these images very likely include the private conversations and interactions of British and US citizens.
The program was apparently meant to develop new techniques and algorithms for facial recognition and picking targets. (Targets? Really?) It gathered (gathers?) one image every five minutes, possibly to avoid violating certain privacy statutes, but more likely to keep from crashing GCHQ servers. It’s one more in a long string of uncomfortable realizations about the deeply invasive spying apparatus Western governments are pointing at their own citizens.
The revelations are likely to get worse, and it seems very unlikely that programs like this one are limited to just Yahoo or the UK — since Snowden’s documents only go up to around 2012 at the latest (that’s when he divulged them to reporter Glenn Greenwald), it’s also very possible this program is still up and running. (Duh, like really?)
And if you just bought a new TV set? It might be that a hidden camera is planted somewhere behind your TV screen too, watching you watching it. Throw a whole blanket over it if you don't want to end up in the 'lust' room deep in the bowels of GCHQ. I wonder what would happen if someone published pictures of a Senator or Parliamentarian's wife or daughters, for instance? Would that even wake the public outrage?
And you must know by now if you live on Earth, that the spy-on-you technology is exponentially growing and someday it might be your refrigerator that notifies the Stasi that you cheated on your rations.But of course, YOU are not doing anything wrong, then what could it matter?
Sure. Go to the front of the gullible line and be respectful.
Still think Snowden is the bad guy?
*based on Pete Brook's article in Wired.
Friday, February 28, 2014
Gravity, the REAL film.
On April 3rd, 2013, Chechnya's tallest building, a luxury hotel caught fire and burned for 29 hours before it was put out. The building was completely destroyed but did not collapse. This raises many questions as to how World Trade Center 7 could have collapsed on 9/11 with only small fires on a couple of floors?
In one photo we see a building almost completely engulfed by fire, which was still standing after 29 hours of intense fire; in the video we see hardly any fire at all, yet that building collapsed, within a few hours, at free fall speed, into it's own footprint!
Fires in high rise buildings have repeatedly left them standing, WT7 was not hit by aircraft, soaked with aviation fuel, or suffered the intensity of raging fires, yet no one has answered the question of why it collapsed at all.
YouTube message after removing this film - This video has been removed for violating YouTube's policy on hate
speech. Learn more about combating hate speech in your country.
The film is the WT7 building on fire and falling down from what millions now agree is controlled demolition. No other steel framed building has EVER come down from fire!
It is never too late to find Truth.
Loose Change - watch before they delete this one too. Also deleted by YouTube which has a twisted view of what hate speech is when it is a report on a world wide tragic event, and virtually all investigative directions point at a secret government action. Here is the current location of 'Loose Change', an accurate account of what happened on Sept 11, 2001. This would be necessary viewing for anyone who cares about reality in history - https://thoughtmaybe.com/?s=Loose+Change .
Monday, February 24, 2014
Monsanto March!
Pssst! I'm going. Are you? Be there May 24th!
May 24th, 2014, in YOUR city!
Click on our links to see what is happening around the world, let's not wait until we humans begin giving birth to two-headed babies, join concerned and thinking people now to show our governments that we demand they take action to ostracize this corporation.
countries with bans of Monsanto
organicconsumers.org/monsanto/
march-against-monsanto
Use your voice - March on May 24!
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Bad Guys vs Good Guys?
You have to decide who is who?
Should we just stop free speech and thank the government for looking after us?
Just a muse about exposing information, but why wasn't Robert Novak charged with outing a working CIA agent when he revealed the Valery Plame identity in his newspaper column? Maybe because he, liked David Gregory was already shilling for the government? When does free speech become treasonous? Why are the standards flexible? Why isn't morality part of the equation?
Sunday, January 12, 2014
European Parliament report on mass surveillance.
Yes, they're a little pissed off.
Many of the European Union states have already lived under a system of constant surveillance, suppression of rights and spying, so they have intense feelings about it, where as the so-called open societies in America, Canada, Australia and Britain continue on in a fog of disbelief and an 'I'm doing nothing wrong' attitude.
EU Surveillance Inquiry Report
Are we cool with spy agencies doing illegal actions to watch us? Are we okay because they're after someone else? Are we acceptable to incarcerating people without charges and a court of law? Are we ignoring secret court decisions and actions? Are we allowing ourselves to slip into a monitored society without the standards of freedom so many fought for in our recent history?
EU Surveillance Inquiry Report
Are we cool with spy agencies doing illegal actions to watch us? Are we okay because they're after someone else? Are we acceptable to incarcerating people without charges and a court of law? Are we ignoring secret court decisions and actions? Are we allowing ourselves to slip into a monitored society without the standards of freedom so many fought for in our recent history?
Are we past the tipping point?
Thursday, January 9, 2014
The FBI - 1971 version
The FBI has been cheating for so long now they think it is normal behavior! Take a while to watch a most interesting and revealing video about the 1971 break-in at an FBI office by activists at a time of turmoil in America. Did it have a lasting effect or was it only a flash? Watch it and comment.
John Raines, Bonnie Raines and Keith Forsyth; their attorney, David Kairys; and Betty Medsger, the former Washington Post reporter who first broke the story of the stolen FBI documents in 1971 and has now revealed the burglars’ identities in her new book, "The Burglary: The Discovery of J. Edgar Hoover’s Secret FBI."
Saturday, January 4, 2014
NSA vs Snowden vs You?
Watch a wrap-up of the 2013 revelations about Edward Snowden, the NSA, Glen Greenwald and the reporting news organizations. Then make your own decisions with some knowledge of the events.
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
Watching the skies ... then and now
Used to be, one of the nicest things you could see in the sky was a hawk circling over a grassy field, looking for his meal.
That sky watching became searching for dangerous aircraft during war and in 1943, the English Homeguard needed to identify planes over the English countryside, so the Observer issued pamphlets like this. The Spitfire was a thrill in its beauty and purpose but most will never see one again, (unless you are watching Foyle's War on British TV.) And there was no point in identifying a V2 and calling someone because it would already be there before the call went through. Of course there's really nothing romantic about war and that was then, this is now .....
Dutch designer Ruben Pater came up with this modern chart of attack and surveillance drones.
Our ancestors could spot natural predators like hawks from afar by their silhouettes. We may need to be also aware of the present day predators. Spies looking for more than a meal. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) predicts that within 20 years there could be 30,000 drones flying over U.S. soil alone. As robotic birds will become commonplace in the near future, we should be prepared to identify them.
Aside from the practicality of using drones in distant wars where the pilot sits in a comfortable facility in his home country, oblivious to any danger, while his Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) hunts down and kills those who are perceived to have a threat to our society, there are now hundreds more uses for UAVs.
From peaceful uses like mapping terrain. Checking out building sites too dangerous for a man. A local police force observing a robbery in progress, to privacy infringing uses where a tiny silent drone looking like a dragon-fly hovers near your bedroom window to peek at you, to the use of a Reaper Drone or a Global Hawk to attack the Pentagon, observed by 214 surveillance cameras but only 10 frames released to the public.
 |
| Grim Reaper? |
Is there a subliminal threat to society looms in the skies with those drones? Recently a Colorado company, who makes drones approved by the US Government, was assisting in surveying flood damage, a useful operation. They were ordered by FEMA, to ground their UAVs and anyone flying one would be arrested! No one has explained why.
Well anyone in the know is already aware that something sinister is going on in Colorado that someone doesn't want you to see. And that's just the beginning.
The future is now, keep watching your skies, just don't shoot down a real hawk, they're just looking for a meal.
drones-are-coming
Sunday, December 15, 2013
Beware Apps in Windows 8.
Of course you know the world is changing, on the net especially. Google, Microsoft and Apple seem to me, to have sold out to the government agencies. (Even though those high tech companies have banded together to try to sue the government into letting them TELL you they are being controlled) You may need to to a little research on your own and look up FISA and FISC Court to enlighten yourself.
On your smart phone, you know that the 'phone', knows exactly where it is at any moment. GPS locating within a foot or two! And it can hear everything you say, and see everything you do. And read and record everything you write. And relate back to an observer exactly where you have been! And when you download a cool App, that will allow you to play a simple game, for instance, you give that App permission to watch everything you do. Not only that, but you give it permission to take the details of ALL your contacts and other information and use the data for whatever purpose. They know who all your friends are. Every person on facebook who ever clicked on you or follows you on Twitter.
So now with Windows 8, you can also get many Apps, from the Microsoft or Google Store, to play games or do productive work on your computer, or to simply entertain yourself. Beware, those Apps are the same as the phone Apps, and you give out the same permissions to strangers to invade your privacy. To see everything on your computer too, every picture of every person you know! Of course you know already that your digital camera embeds all the data of that picture within the numbers. Who took it, where, and when.
Remember when you bought the software on a CD? And loaded it onto your computer and no one knew anything about it. It was yours to do whatever you wanted with it. But under the mask of fearing piracy, Microsoft and others now keep the control and knowledge of who is using their software in their own 'cloud'!
BTW, the cloud use is plunging because no company will trust their private information to a leaky sieve in another company.
Do you think it is going to be like Russia or East Berlin? Don't kid yourself, it'll be way worse than that. Are your children getting good grades? Are their aptitudes being sent over the web by the education department? Do they really like art or music but might be more suitible for a technology career? Is a REeducation department going to be making that decision for them? The future is nigh.
The coming technology to be used against you will include voice-prints unique to YOU, and listening technology that can hear you whisper inside your bedroom from miles away! They already have facial recognition and YOU are probably already in that data-bank! We know the FBI can turn on your web-cam without the little light to show you it is on! And the NSA is siphoning virtually ALL the data going anywhere on the web. These kinds of leaks don't come out unless they've already been doing it for years!
And now there are reports of cameras hidden inside your smart TV, behind the screen! Watching you!
"We only want to know what channels you're watching," they say, while the guy behind them in the black hat nods agreement.
And have you noticed that the new laptop computers no longer have a removable battery? Is that so you cannot shut off the power supply so your meta data is still able to be transmitted? Without your knowledge.
And the government and law enforcement drone programs are ramping up so you can expect to see a drone patrolling your neighborhood in the immediate future. Yes, the very same drones that take out Pakistani or Yemeni 'bad guys' plotting against someone. And drones are capable to locking on a target and watching it for days! The target being YOU! And their batteries can be recharged with a laser! Allowing them to stalk you for perhaps weeks!
Shoot them down? The populace has guns. How many in that fringe populace are sharpshooters? The see-all drone will notice when you walk out on your porch with a long rifle. Don't the gun owners know that these dark forces already have them pinpointed? Innocent gun club people and deer hunters are not safe with any weapons.
So we've already seen those old WWII pics of people being transported on train to 'detention camps', but there's no need to ship you anywhere, only to pick out the trouble makers and contain them. Even small town police forces have SWAT equipment and armored riot vehicles. And FEMA, which is supposedly there to help you in times of emergency, has bought millions of rounds of hollow point ammo!
Homeland Security is securing the homeland, but for whom?
Is anyone noticing how many high military men are being removed from command? The problem with taking over a country is that the unknown quotient is who of the military will actually fire upon their own citizens if those people wake up and are forced into mass protests? Kent State will be like a Maypole party. Preparation is to remove those in suspect mode of not following orders. Maybe patriotic men.
And it is becoming increasingly evident, that whatever party, left or center or right, from fascist to communist, or whatever ideology they pretend to have, has no control whatever on the progression of this shadow government and their dark agenda. So if it's Bush or Obama, Chelsea Clinton or Mary Cheney, take your pick and spin the wheel, all the stops are at 'Bankrupt' anyway.
Don't shoot me, I am only the messenger. Unarmed.
But wait, information is armament isn't it?
You notice I have not used the word terrorist yet, maybe it's because I don't know WHO the actual terrorists ARE!
Beware.
On your smart phone, you know that the 'phone', knows exactly where it is at any moment. GPS locating within a foot or two! And it can hear everything you say, and see everything you do. And read and record everything you write. And relate back to an observer exactly where you have been! And when you download a cool App, that will allow you to play a simple game, for instance, you give that App permission to watch everything you do. Not only that, but you give it permission to take the details of ALL your contacts and other information and use the data for whatever purpose. They know who all your friends are. Every person on facebook who ever clicked on you or follows you on Twitter.
So now with Windows 8, you can also get many Apps, from the Microsoft or Google Store, to play games or do productive work on your computer, or to simply entertain yourself. Beware, those Apps are the same as the phone Apps, and you give out the same permissions to strangers to invade your privacy. To see everything on your computer too, every picture of every person you know! Of course you know already that your digital camera embeds all the data of that picture within the numbers. Who took it, where, and when.
Remember when you bought the software on a CD? And loaded it onto your computer and no one knew anything about it. It was yours to do whatever you wanted with it. But under the mask of fearing piracy, Microsoft and others now keep the control and knowledge of who is using their software in their own 'cloud'!
BTW, the cloud use is plunging because no company will trust their private information to a leaky sieve in another company.
Do you think it is going to be like Russia or East Berlin? Don't kid yourself, it'll be way worse than that. Are your children getting good grades? Are their aptitudes being sent over the web by the education department? Do they really like art or music but might be more suitible for a technology career? Is a REeducation department going to be making that decision for them? The future is nigh.
The coming technology to be used against you will include voice-prints unique to YOU, and listening technology that can hear you whisper inside your bedroom from miles away! They already have facial recognition and YOU are probably already in that data-bank! We know the FBI can turn on your web-cam without the little light to show you it is on! And the NSA is siphoning virtually ALL the data going anywhere on the web. These kinds of leaks don't come out unless they've already been doing it for years!And now there are reports of cameras hidden inside your smart TV, behind the screen! Watching you!
"We only want to know what channels you're watching," they say, while the guy behind them in the black hat nods agreement.
And have you noticed that the new laptop computers no longer have a removable battery? Is that so you cannot shut off the power supply so your meta data is still able to be transmitted? Without your knowledge.
And the government and law enforcement drone programs are ramping up so you can expect to see a drone patrolling your neighborhood in the immediate future. Yes, the very same drones that take out Pakistani or Yemeni 'bad guys' plotting against someone. And drones are capable to locking on a target and watching it for days! The target being YOU! And their batteries can be recharged with a laser! Allowing them to stalk you for perhaps weeks!
Shoot them down? The populace has guns. How many in that fringe populace are sharpshooters? The see-all drone will notice when you walk out on your porch with a long rifle. Don't the gun owners know that these dark forces already have them pinpointed? Innocent gun club people and deer hunters are not safe with any weapons.
So we've already seen those old WWII pics of people being transported on train to 'detention camps', but there's no need to ship you anywhere, only to pick out the trouble makers and contain them. Even small town police forces have SWAT equipment and armored riot vehicles. And FEMA, which is supposedly there to help you in times of emergency, has bought millions of rounds of hollow point ammo!
Homeland Security is securing the homeland, but for whom?
Is anyone noticing how many high military men are being removed from command? The problem with taking over a country is that the unknown quotient is who of the military will actually fire upon their own citizens if those people wake up and are forced into mass protests? Kent State will be like a Maypole party. Preparation is to remove those in suspect mode of not following orders. Maybe patriotic men.
And it is becoming increasingly evident, that whatever party, left or center or right, from fascist to communist, or whatever ideology they pretend to have, has no control whatever on the progression of this shadow government and their dark agenda. So if it's Bush or Obama, Chelsea Clinton or Mary Cheney, take your pick and spin the wheel, all the stops are at 'Bankrupt' anyway.
Don't shoot me, I am only the messenger. Unarmed.
But wait, information is armament isn't it?
You notice I have not used the word terrorist yet, maybe it's because I don't know WHO the actual terrorists ARE!
Beware.
Friday, November 22, 2013
November 22.
Appropo on this day .... Jim Marrs, always ....
Where were you? What do you think now? Who really did it?
check out some other links ....
today-in-history-november-24
this-day-in-history-september-27
Where were you? What do you think now? Who really did it?
check out some other links ....
today-in-history-november-24
this-day-in-history-september-27
Thursday, October 31, 2013
Dirty old men and web teens ...
Evidently Outlook doesn't mind if you contact those pretty young girls, looks like it is even encouraging it here? This is what comes up when I close an Outlook account after reading my email. An invitation to start a Skype conversation with a cute blonde.
Parents everywhere are frightened out of their wits about their children being preyed upon by web stalkers. So what is this all about? Don't ask me, ask Microsoft, they're the ones who changed Hotmail into Outlook. Now they want to connect your Twitter account to Outlook. And any or all of your other social media accounts.
Makes you wonder why, doesn't it?
Here's why? Because the powers behind the scenes want to track you better, so connecting your Twitter etc. with your Outlook accounts, makes it a little easier for cross-referencing. And the more people on Skype, allows the NSA et al, to use PRISM's facial recognition software to add YOU into their database. In that secret huge new center in Utah. Now you know why Microsoft bought Skype for 8.5 billion when there were no other bidders, and ..... here's the big one, who installed the rogue code of spyware onto it almost immediately.
But are they using young blondes as bait-girls? Hmm, you decide exactly what is being encouraged here.
. . . So you can coordinate and contact a girl on Skype and perhaps see her, write on her Facebook wall, message her on Twitter, there's even a pop-up dialogue box inviting her to the beach with you! You get her personal email address and even her Seattle home town with zip code!
Scary, huh?
Or maybe it's just the NSA wanting to see if you're a dirty old man?
Keep on clicking .... at your own risk.
Parents everywhere are frightened out of their wits about their children being preyed upon by web stalkers. So what is this all about? Don't ask me, ask Microsoft, they're the ones who changed Hotmail into Outlook. Now they want to connect your Twitter account to Outlook. And any or all of your other social media accounts.
Makes you wonder why, doesn't it?
Here's why? Because the powers behind the scenes want to track you better, so connecting your Twitter etc. with your Outlook accounts, makes it a little easier for cross-referencing. And the more people on Skype, allows the NSA et al, to use PRISM's facial recognition software to add YOU into their database. In that secret huge new center in Utah. Now you know why Microsoft bought Skype for 8.5 billion when there were no other bidders, and ..... here's the big one, who installed the rogue code of spyware onto it almost immediately.
But are they using young blondes as bait-girls? Hmm, you decide exactly what is being encouraged here.
#supermultitasker
Send Tweets from the People pane when you connect your Twitter account to Outlook.com.
. . . So you can coordinate and contact a girl on Skype and perhaps see her, write on her Facebook wall, message her on Twitter, there's even a pop-up dialogue box inviting her to the beach with you! You get her personal email address and even her Seattle home town with zip code!
Scary, huh?
Or maybe it's just the NSA wanting to see if you're a dirty old man?
Keep on clicking .... at your own risk.
Thursday, October 17, 2013
Pic and Pay?
So the Federal Government is saying they want to help out the middle class. Just because they care. And the CRTC, Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission, has somehow been holding back Canadians from getting what they really want in cable TV viewing.
Of course we all know all this and presently, you may be getting the Essentials set-up from your cable provider, or perhaps the next level up, a Medium assortment. It is the norm in cable business, but it seems to be in favour of cable companies and channel owners to all make money.
And the latest studies conclude that the TV viewing public (middle class) is gravitating AWAY from cable television because of ineffective bundling.
The fly in the ethereal ointment is that the cable companies bundle everything. You might get the network TV channels, news channels and some local channels, but anything else you want, will come at extra cost. And this is what the buying public doesn't like.
If you want Speed or HBO, for instance, you'll have to take the Kardassians channel, the National Quilting and Tatting channel, and three cartoon channels. Lots of people have channels they are paying for but have never ever switched on to!
So what the government is proposing, is for you to pick the channels you want, and pay for them individually. Which is what we all want. Seems totally reasonable. But this idea seems totally new to them. More proof that they don't listen to the buying public when the old guys club is running things.
A great idea to me would be for you to take the Essential channels for a basic price, and then pay, say, a buck or two bucks per channel after that. And if the cable companies think they are losing money on that deal, you'd have to pick enough channels to make it profitable for your cable provider to operate. It might cost you the same, but you'd get something you're interested in watching!
Many of the small cable companies would welcome such a deal because it would allow them to cater to a certain demographic, a profitable group of TV watchers for them! And would allow the entry into the market of many specialty channels not offered presently!
And the general trend in TV viewing is to watch what you want on the internet or Netflix. The key here is that it is what you WANT!
But to many of us poor public, we are farced ... (Freudian slip) forced, to take those obscure channels that literally NO ONE watches. It was expressed recently by a cable adviser, that if 200 people want to see the Poodle Grooming Specialty channel, no one would pay to have it so it gets bundled. If you like the Total Violence and Mayhem channel, today you have to take Tree-Top Children too. So wouldn't a fair play be the one that forces those 200 people to watch brushing a dog on the web instead on mainstream cable?
The catering is backwards. And TV is generally worried because many thousands or even millions of people are now getting their TV from the web. Not good for TV advertisers. Corporations like NBC, CBS, ABC and basically all of them are wondering what the future holds for them?
Ah, but here's the rub: Joe Friendly wants to start his own TV channel, say about Funeral Home Families, call it Ted and Dead. But Joe needs to get his channel bundled to make a profit. So how does he go about getting the CRTC to add his channel to the lineup and cash in on bundling?
Hmm. Let's just say, just say ......
Mr. Joe Friendly approaches the Power Person in the business who can get things done, like a listing, the business being the CTRC, and Joe says, "What'll it take for me to get in on this cash cow?"
Power Person shrugs, "Oh it's so hard, there's no way."
"Way," says business savvy Joe Friendly. "What if I had a budget for getting a listing, say, $30,000?"
"How would that work, innocent Power Person asks?" A sparkle beginning to appear in his eye.
"Well,", say Joe, "if we were to get listed and bundled, it would guarantee us a sizable profit. And we ARE a generous company."
"Yes, indeed it would, Joe, even if no one watches your funeral homes and those who live within their cool walls."
"So you see then? I could put you on our TV channel studies panel. As an adviser. So it would be a totally legitimate transaction. An honorarium for your expertise.""Yes Joe, I do see, it would," and Mr. Power then inquires, "and how would that honorarium come about? "
Joe Friendly is quick to reply, "Old bills in a plain brown envelope."
"We'll bundle you with CNN, CBC, Ted Talks and the Walking Dead, how's that?"
"Perfect."
Of course, EVERYTHING is bundled with the NSA and CCTV these days too.
Meanwhile the Government is bundling up their propaganda for an election and helping the middle class seems like a good platform idea ... even if it's a lie and comes bundled with Harper, Trudeau and Mulcair.
Of course we all know all this and presently, you may be getting the Essentials set-up from your cable provider, or perhaps the next level up, a Medium assortment. It is the norm in cable business, but it seems to be in favour of cable companies and channel owners to all make money.
And the latest studies conclude that the TV viewing public (middle class) is gravitating AWAY from cable television because of ineffective bundling.
The fly in the ethereal ointment is that the cable companies bundle everything. You might get the network TV channels, news channels and some local channels, but anything else you want, will come at extra cost. And this is what the buying public doesn't like.
If you want Speed or HBO, for instance, you'll have to take the Kardassians channel, the National Quilting and Tatting channel, and three cartoon channels. Lots of people have channels they are paying for but have never ever switched on to!
So what the government is proposing, is for you to pick the channels you want, and pay for them individually. Which is what we all want. Seems totally reasonable. But this idea seems totally new to them. More proof that they don't listen to the buying public when the old guys club is running things.
A great idea to me would be for you to take the Essential channels for a basic price, and then pay, say, a buck or two bucks per channel after that. And if the cable companies think they are losing money on that deal, you'd have to pick enough channels to make it profitable for your cable provider to operate. It might cost you the same, but you'd get something you're interested in watching!
Many of the small cable companies would welcome such a deal because it would allow them to cater to a certain demographic, a profitable group of TV watchers for them! And would allow the entry into the market of many specialty channels not offered presently!
And the general trend in TV viewing is to watch what you want on the internet or Netflix. The key here is that it is what you WANT!
But to many of us poor public, we are farced ... (Freudian slip) forced, to take those obscure channels that literally NO ONE watches. It was expressed recently by a cable adviser, that if 200 people want to see the Poodle Grooming Specialty channel, no one would pay to have it so it gets bundled. If you like the Total Violence and Mayhem channel, today you have to take Tree-Top Children too. So wouldn't a fair play be the one that forces those 200 people to watch brushing a dog on the web instead on mainstream cable?
The catering is backwards. And TV is generally worried because many thousands or even millions of people are now getting their TV from the web. Not good for TV advertisers. Corporations like NBC, CBS, ABC and basically all of them are wondering what the future holds for them?
Ah, but here's the rub: Joe Friendly wants to start his own TV channel, say about Funeral Home Families, call it Ted and Dead. But Joe needs to get his channel bundled to make a profit. So how does he go about getting the CRTC to add his channel to the lineup and cash in on bundling?
Hmm. Let's just say, just say ......
Mr. Joe Friendly approaches the Power Person in the business who can get things done, like a listing, the business being the CTRC, and Joe says, "What'll it take for me to get in on this cash cow?"
Power Person shrugs, "Oh it's so hard, there's no way."
"Way," says business savvy Joe Friendly. "What if I had a budget for getting a listing, say, $30,000?"
"How would that work, innocent Power Person asks?" A sparkle beginning to appear in his eye.
"Well,", say Joe, "if we were to get listed and bundled, it would guarantee us a sizable profit. And we ARE a generous company."
"Yes, indeed it would, Joe, even if no one watches your funeral homes and those who live within their cool walls."
"So you see then? I could put you on our TV channel studies panel. As an adviser. So it would be a totally legitimate transaction. An honorarium for your expertise.""Yes Joe, I do see, it would," and Mr. Power then inquires, "and how would that honorarium come about? "
Joe Friendly is quick to reply, "Old bills in a plain brown envelope."
"We'll bundle you with CNN, CBC, Ted Talks and the Walking Dead, how's that?"
"Perfect."
Of course, EVERYTHING is bundled with the NSA and CCTV these days too.
Meanwhile the Government is bundling up their propaganda for an election and helping the middle class seems like a good platform idea ... even if it's a lie and comes bundled with Harper, Trudeau and Mulcair.
Saturday, October 5, 2013
Universe unfolding in Iraq
Iraq, then and now - As forecast by many, in 2013 the internecine war continues, the Sunnis versus the Shiites, exactly as it was for centuries. An ongoing religious conflict. A war that Saddam Hussein had control of until his actual oil reserves were known and envious eyes landed on his desert sands.
Since the 2003 invasion of the country by US and UK forces the infrastructure has deteriorated to such a degree that it is estimated the country will need up to 1 TRILLION more (2013) to 'rebuild it's crumbling infrastructure and battered economy', said by the head of the National Investment Commission in Iraq. Doesn't the question come to mind as to what these non-bidding reconstruction companies like Haliburton, Kellogg, Brown and Root and Blackwater and others have been doing there for 10 years? These companies got a 1.5 billion dollar deal to rebuild the country. All paid for by US taxpayers. Remember the original concept? The rebuild would come from Iraq oil sales.
In a March, 2013 final report to Congress, Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction Stuart Bowen's conclusion was all too clear: Since the invasion a decade ago this month, the U.S. has spent too much money in Iraq for too few results. And the Huffington Post reports that in nine years of war in Iraq, 4,448 Americans died and 32,221 were wounded in battle, leaving behind a deeply divided country steeped in corruption.
But in some cases, can we suspect there are handshakes all around and the feeling that they all made money. Why doesn't someone admit that was the plan all along?
The Iraqi people are no better now than 10 years ago and the American people are also a little poorer.
Read just a few news reports from the last 10 years to see how it unfolds, but not as it should -
The careful plans - 2003
USA Today Rebuilding Iraq
Proceding as planned - 2004
CNN Iraq rebuild
Get rid of evidence - 2005
The Guardian Iraq
Rebuilding overhead costs - 2006
NYTimes reconstruct
Where is the money going? - 2007
Nation Public Radio report
Infrastructure failures - 2008
Global Policy Forum reconstruction
Model education system? - 2009
Radio Free Europe Iraq Struggles
Watchdog Agency -wasted billions - 2010
Fox News wasted billions
60 billion achieves little - 2011
BBC news - world
Reconstruction efforts cost 719 lives - 2012
Bloomberg News-audit
If you don't read any of the other links, a least read this one - from CBC News 2013 - The final report -
CBS News.com $60b to rebuild iraq wasted
Should children be scavenging for tidbits for survival?
Is this an endless scenario? Anyone with sanity would think no,
but the world has gone crazy, hasn't it?
In a March, 2013 final report to Congress, Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction Stuart Bowen's conclusion was all too clear: Since the invasion a decade ago this month, the U.S. has spent too much money in Iraq for too few results. And the Huffington Post reports that in nine years of war in Iraq, 4,448 Americans died and 32,221 were wounded in battle, leaving behind a deeply divided country steeped in corruption.
But in some cases, can we suspect there are handshakes all around and the feeling that they all made money. Why doesn't someone admit that was the plan all along?
The Iraqi people are no better now than 10 years ago and the American people are also a little poorer.
Read just a few news reports from the last 10 years to see how it unfolds, but not as it should -
The careful plans - 2003
USA Today Rebuilding Iraq
Proceding as planned - 2004
CNN Iraq rebuild
Get rid of evidence - 2005
The Guardian Iraq
Rebuilding overhead costs - 2006
NYTimes reconstruct
Where is the money going? - 2007
Nation Public Radio report
Infrastructure failures - 2008
Global Policy Forum reconstruction
Model education system? - 2009
Radio Free Europe Iraq Struggles
Watchdog Agency -wasted billions - 2010
Fox News wasted billions
60 billion achieves little - 2011
BBC news - world
Reconstruction efforts cost 719 lives - 2012
Bloomberg News-audit
 |
| Who will they target in the future? |
 |
| Where are you going, children? Out to play, Mom. Okay. |
If you don't read any of the other links, a least read this one - from CBC News 2013 - The final report -
CBS News.com $60b to rebuild iraq wasted
Should children be scavenging for tidbits for survival?
Is this an endless scenario? Anyone with sanity would think no,
but the world has gone crazy, hasn't it?
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
Questions. Always. Questions.
Aaron Alexis, the 34 year old shooter in the Washington Naval Yard, seems to be already having conflicting items and events swirling about him and his actions. How much is truth? And how much is fog? There seem to be contradictions in the answers to questions in the first hours after and the answers many hours later. Many more questions need answers, the intriguing question being, will they be answered at all?
It's not unbelievable that a man could live such a paradox life, filled with contradictions and flurried directions of an unstable mind, but at such a terrible event his actions need a complete and thorough investigation. All the questions about Aaron Alexi need to be carefully considered, asked, and answered.
- If he had so many bad incidents while in the Navy that led to his discharge, how did he get Secret level security clearance?
- How did he get hired as an 'expert' by Hewlett Packard after basically being kicked out of the Navy?
- What work did he do for the Navy in Japan? Refreshing computer systems? And what was the pay dispute?
- All his friends and acquaintances tell of him being a gentle man, studying Buddhism, meditating, and yet the profile being built of him after the event is one of paranoia and anger issues?
- He checked into a Rhode Island hotel and called police about being followed or watched? And complained about hearing voices? What was he doing there?
- If he was so broke, how did he afford the rifle? And/or a shotgun? And renting a car? And traveling to Thailand?
- And how long had he owned that rifle? He evidently had time to carve whole phrases into the stock! Including ELF, generally meaning 'Extremely Low Frequency,' for you HAARP people.
- Who was paying for his hotel room? Who was the person who met him there prior to his starting work at the Naval Yard? He only worked there for a week, why did he suddenly snap now?
- The Swat team of Special Agents from the ATF arrived quickly, the same one from the Boston bombing of the Tsarnaevs, a seven hour drive away, apparently they are stationed in Washington. Why was it the same team that was in Boston at that other incident?
- If Alexi was being treated for paranoia and suspected of mental issues, why weren't they available to a mental check for his job at Experts, the HP subsidiary?
- Why wasn't his arrest record in Seattle and Fort Worth available to HP? And his Navy record considered for a security clearance.
- Was there another man involved who remains unidentified? The grey haired white man?
- Where exactly did he live? They say he was formerly from Fort Worth but no indication of where his domicile was now?And he is said to have had several addresses in Fort Worth?
- The first people interviewed describe Alexis of being a quiet gentle man, yet now reports say he was a hardcore drinker and spent hours playing 'violent shooting' video games? More conflicting info or implanted info?
- A monk's assistant from the Buddhist Temple he often attended said he could have believed Alexis' would have committed suicide but not murder.
- Others said that Alexi seemed like he had been in the military by the way he carried himself but never talked about violence or guns.
- He is said to have often helped out others, not expecting anything in return. And worked in his friend's restaurant for no pay. Even communicated with diners in the Thai language.
- His latest landlord said that he had never seen his tenant get angry about anything.
- Did someone 'open doors' for Alexis to move easily through his motions on the weeks or months previous and on the day of the event?
- After leaving the Navy in January 2011, Alexis retained the clearance even with three arrests, a history of mental illness and a record of military misconduct.
- USIS, the private company that performs 65% of all background checks, (and the same company that vetted Edward Snowden) failed to discover anything wrong with Aaron Alexis, "... What’s emerging is a pattern of failure on the part of this company, and a failure of this entire system, that risks nothing less than our national security and the lives of Americans,” Senator Claire McCaskill, a Missouri Democrat, said in a statement. She added that USIS is under criminal investigation.
- USIS is now based in Providence, Rhode Island.
- As information emerges, can we see that a troubled man seeking psychiatric help from VA agencies could in some way be manipulated psychologically?
- Is some shadowy agency building a convenient profile of disinformation now to make a credible case that he would shoot people? For what purpose?
It's not unbelievable that a man could live such a paradox life, filled with contradictions and flurried directions of an unstable mind, but at such a terrible event his actions need a complete and thorough investigation. All the questions about Aaron Alexi need to be carefully considered, asked, and answered.
 |
| manipulated? |
- Were Aaron Alexi's deathly last movements orchestrated for some secret purpose yet to be revealed? What will answers tell about the tragic events on September 16, 2013.
- Will there be answers?
- Or just more questions?
Monday, September 9, 2013
Outward/Inward Syria
Overt intention = strike with cruise missiles at Assad's Syria to stop chemicals being used against rebels. (even if the 'who used them' is not yet known) Destroy airports and shoot down any planes headed for US warships in the Mediterranean fleet. Use the US Military to police the area however seems appropriate. Protect America.Covert intention = cause Syria to strike back in retaliation and start the new war. Launch Tomahawk cruise missiles at Syrian military targets and wait for Iran to join in. Enlist Israel to strike at nuclear facilities in Iran. Continue new battles in Middle East by aircraft, missiles and more drones without more troops on the ground. Protect America.
Deepest intentions = and true intended results - inflame the terrorist factions of al Qaeda, al Nusra and other Islamic radicals in Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, to strike Americans anywhere on the globe. Instigate the rise of more home grown radicals within the USA, thereby forcing Marshal Law to come into effect to protect the American people from terrorists in their own country. Mass total surveillance and monitoring of every single person and the subjugation of the continental American people by the special military in accordance with the ongoing 9/11 plan. Make every city locked down like Boston. The New World Order continues to take effect? Subjugate America. |
| we have dropped our guard |
Tuesday, September 3, 2013
Facebook + NSA = same thing.
So Facebook is now tagging you with facial recognition software. And suggesting your friends also tag you - which is actually identifying you to whomever wants to know.
The facial recognition software makes measurements of distance between your eyes, nose, ears and mouth etc. You can identify yourself or if others see a pic of you, they are encouraged to 'tag' you, that is place your name on that picture. Thereby identifying you whether you like it or not. This all builds a unique template of YOU. Whether you like it or not.
Yes you can opt out, but that might be a complicated process. And who can trust these web entities any more. So if a company like Facebook would do it in the first place, and try to make you believe it is for your benefit, good luck trying to explain ethics to them. And we all know by now, or should, that anything Facebook does in relation to privacy, is shared with the NSA. Do you still laugh when someone mentions New World Order? Or One World Government?
Already Germany is about to sue Facebook over privacy issues, and if the Monsanto thing has any traction, other European countries will follow. Europeans know what is it like to be spied upon. And tattled about. North Americans have yet to learn but they may be too naive, skeptical or stupid and too late to comprehend the implications of the problem.
Try telling your friends that facial recognition of them will be added to a 600 million person database in Facebook. And by extension, added to the database of NSA, which is probably 1000 times larger. Yes folks, they know where you are every minute of your life, Google Earth told them where you live, Street View has a picture of your house, and now they see exactly what you look like.
Each day, Facebook users upload over 200 million photos! Into a database already holding 90 BILLION photos. Keep in mind that there are only 7 billion people on Earth, so you can be sure that you are already in there with a memorized, measured, cataloged, identified, face.
And you know that certain people who want to access these databases, will.
The Wall Street Journal takes time to point out NSA's evasions and misleadings. Even PC World, in a review of this process, calls it 'downright creepy', and suggests uploading pictures of trees and cars and tagging them with your own name.
There IS a way to fight back. A small way perhaps, but an even better idea would be to go to virtually ALL your friends' pages, and tag every single picture with a made-up name. Tag Mary Parker as Joe Plumeria. Tag someone's dog with Harvey Black. Tag Harvey Black with the name Phillip White. Tag a black man as Hung Lo. A Chinese friend as Lord Churchill. Databases become useless with misinformation, now you too can take part in a DISinformation campaign. People are already doing it by lying to pollsters.
And some communities in Europe and Asia are setting up their own web communications with networks that DON'T pass through the NSA-Prism siphon upload points to avoid being spied upon. So with enough participation and fortitude, people can at least entangle the spy database into the non recognition of individuals.
Funny how we loved Bill Gates for building Microsoft into a communication giant. And when he was threatened with the dismantling of Microsoft by the US Government for being non competitive, and they were about to split Microsoft into three separate entities, but Gates attended secret meetings, and thereafter everything continued along as usual. Leading many to suspect those threats from the Government were only a sneaky way to get Gates to comply with sneaking government software codes into Windows, so-called 'backdoor access', with tattle-tale info on what YOU were just doing on line. Or lose his baby. Remember the Windows unique identification number? Well your hard drive still has one.
And now Mark Zuckerberg, the brash and somewhat arrogant founder of Facebook, after cashing in big time, has restructured the social site with antisocial behavior to tattle on you? Tattle is perhaps too light a word, whisper might be better.
And the shadowy people in Forte Mead, Maryland, anonymous behind the black glass of NSA are grinning with glee as everyone plays the Facebook game.
So here I am, tag me as Scottie MacDuff.
I'm heading to my yurt on the sandy steppes of Mongolia, no facial recognition there.
But I will be tagging the the yaks as horses and the goats as camels, just in case.
The facial recognition software makes measurements of distance between your eyes, nose, ears and mouth etc. You can identify yourself or if others see a pic of you, they are encouraged to 'tag' you, that is place your name on that picture. Thereby identifying you whether you like it or not. This all builds a unique template of YOU. Whether you like it or not.
Yes you can opt out, but that might be a complicated process. And who can trust these web entities any more. So if a company like Facebook would do it in the first place, and try to make you believe it is for your benefit, good luck trying to explain ethics to them. And we all know by now, or should, that anything Facebook does in relation to privacy, is shared with the NSA. Do you still laugh when someone mentions New World Order? Or One World Government?
Already Germany is about to sue Facebook over privacy issues, and if the Monsanto thing has any traction, other European countries will follow. Europeans know what is it like to be spied upon. And tattled about. North Americans have yet to learn but they may be too naive, skeptical or stupid and too late to comprehend the implications of the problem.
Try telling your friends that facial recognition of them will be added to a 600 million person database in Facebook. And by extension, added to the database of NSA, which is probably 1000 times larger. Yes folks, they know where you are every minute of your life, Google Earth told them where you live, Street View has a picture of your house, and now they see exactly what you look like.
Each day, Facebook users upload over 200 million photos! Into a database already holding 90 BILLION photos. Keep in mind that there are only 7 billion people on Earth, so you can be sure that you are already in there with a memorized, measured, cataloged, identified, face.
And you know that certain people who want to access these databases, will.
The Wall Street Journal takes time to point out NSA's evasions and misleadings. Even PC World, in a review of this process, calls it 'downright creepy', and suggests uploading pictures of trees and cars and tagging them with your own name.
There IS a way to fight back. A small way perhaps, but an even better idea would be to go to virtually ALL your friends' pages, and tag every single picture with a made-up name. Tag Mary Parker as Joe Plumeria. Tag someone's dog with Harvey Black. Tag Harvey Black with the name Phillip White. Tag a black man as Hung Lo. A Chinese friend as Lord Churchill. Databases become useless with misinformation, now you too can take part in a DISinformation campaign. People are already doing it by lying to pollsters.
And some communities in Europe and Asia are setting up their own web communications with networks that DON'T pass through the NSA-Prism siphon upload points to avoid being spied upon. So with enough participation and fortitude, people can at least entangle the spy database into the non recognition of individuals.
Funny how we loved Bill Gates for building Microsoft into a communication giant. And when he was threatened with the dismantling of Microsoft by the US Government for being non competitive, and they were about to split Microsoft into three separate entities, but Gates attended secret meetings, and thereafter everything continued along as usual. Leading many to suspect those threats from the Government were only a sneaky way to get Gates to comply with sneaking government software codes into Windows, so-called 'backdoor access', with tattle-tale info on what YOU were just doing on line. Or lose his baby. Remember the Windows unique identification number? Well your hard drive still has one.
And now Mark Zuckerberg, the brash and somewhat arrogant founder of Facebook, after cashing in big time, has restructured the social site with antisocial behavior to tattle on you? Tattle is perhaps too light a word, whisper might be better.
And the shadowy people in Forte Mead, Maryland, anonymous behind the black glass of NSA are grinning with glee as everyone plays the Facebook game.
So here I am, tag me as Scottie MacDuff.
I'm heading to my yurt on the sandy steppes of Mongolia, no facial recognition there.
But I will be tagging the the yaks as horses and the goats as camels, just in case.
Saturday, August 24, 2013
Google and the NSA
from an article by Julian Assange in The Stringer newspaper ...
google-and-the-nsa-whos-holding-the-shit-bag-now
You might be interested in these search engines as alternatives that do not track you or where you go - - -
duckduckgo search
ixquick search
both easily added to your search bar.
Value your privacy.
google-and-the-nsa-whos-holding-the-shit-bag-nowYou might be interested in these search engines as alternatives that do not track you or where you go - - -
duckduckgo search
ixquick search
both easily added to your search bar.
Value your privacy.
Sunday, August 18, 2013
Welcome to Amerika
This map appeared during a presentation by Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein about the NSA at a Senate Judiciary Committee meeting.
It seems now that America considers Canada as just another part of the USA Homeland. We knew that already though, right? It looks like Greenland is a part too but they cleverly covered rebellious Iceland. (not sure how Denmark feels about Greenland's inclusion)
It was also recently revealed that NSA paid GCHQ, Britain's equivalent spy agency, 150 million in hush-hush money to influence British intelligence gathering operations. So can we assume that Britain is also now part of the USA?
Africa and Australia don't get a color.
So now that we are American citizens too, where do we go to get those benefits Americans get so much of?
Um .... what were they again?
Oh. No healthcare, you say? Ah yes, they consider it a good thing not to have it, don't they?
Should we begin referring to the Homeland as der Fatherland?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)