FBI RELEASE OF 9/11 PENTAGON PHOTOS

Just wondering about this ...

The FBI has just newly released*  'never before seen' photos from 9/11. It is on Twitter and social media as well as many media outlets, few of them MSM.
Seems like a long time to make a decision like that, considering that they took away over 200 surveillance tapes from local area businesses on the day. And finding out that the Pentagon's own hundred or so cameras were not working or were (mysteriously) shut off on that day. And then the agency only showed us 4 frames of something blasting into the Pentagon on 9/11.

Many will suspect that someone in a US government agency had plenty of time to Photoshop anything they wanted into any pics. But there are still no wings, no tail section, no fuselage, no luggage, no engines strewn on that Pentagon lawn. No dead BODIES! And no belief anywhere that even the best pilots could have flown like a Tom Cruise Top-Gun Air Ace, never mind ANY pilot from al Qaeda or any other terrorist group.
However, a cruise missile (no pun) or an armed Global Hawk is another thing entirely ....

Have a look at these pictures, anything odd looking to you? Like in this aerial view, we see that whatever smashed through the first (outside) building, seemed to get through the second building without a trace, and then resumed its destruction on the third in line building. Which, is effectually through the 6th reinforced concrete wall. Hmm?


I thought I read somewhere that there were LAWS of physics. ???

Seems incredible to me, but there are certain engineers who will use the same logic from WTC 1 and 2 to explain. They said then that the already burning jet fuel ran down 110 floors without being absorbed into the concrete, or the carpeted floors, or the wooden desks or drywall, without burning out, and caused molten steel to be still burning in the basements four weeks later!
So those same spinner engineers will tell us a missile OR a whole 737 could somehow wiggle through the second Pentagon layer building without damaging it, yet burn the third. Sure, tell that one to Einstein.

Meanwhile most skeptics will continue the scrutiny of new releases of information or photos from that day. From whomever releases them. All these photos are harmless, show nothing new and are basically irrelevant.
The only thing is when you read the captions, the comments and info seem to be doing nothing except still trying to convince us that a passenger plane full of people, piloted by crazed Arabs with super-hero skills, crashed on that day.

Nice lil round hole. No Boeing junk. They explain any other holes in Pentagon walls to explosions caused by heat. Hmm. They did find some scrap metal parts of damaged fuselage from an American Airlines plane. Find? or put there? But none scorched and all on that famous lawn that didn't burn. Must be rubber to bounce this far from the scene ....

Here is a more revealing photo from that fateful day, which although whatever is under that blue tarp is covered, exposes a lot more than intended ....if it is passenger plane debris, WHY would it need to be covered?

(not among new releases)

Why? Maybe because it is the identifiable remains of a Global Hawk? Or perhaps a Preditor drone? Perhaps even the MQ-1C Grey Eagle, which officially began operating in 2012.

Is that piece under that tarp for the same reason all that WTC 1, 2 and 7 steel went to China in the immediate hours after the demolition? Get it the hell out of here? Someone might find residual thermite? There are now so many watchers that someone might see numbers and ID whatever that piece is. Why are the military, FBI, CIA etc. so afraid? 

This ain't over yet.


You can look at the released photos here - keep in mind they are sometimes days after the fact when taken and it is YEARS after the fact now - (Give me enough time with my own Photoshop 7 and I'll put anything you like into those pics.)
FBI release photos - BBC

Look especially at the second pic; Water cannons ... the gap seems to be about 20 yards wide. Then the following aerial pic, now the gap is only about 2 yards wide? WTF?

See all 27 here -  FBI vault pics






*newly released - - - FBI spokeswoman Jillian Stickels said the pictures were first posted online in 2011. But a technical glitch caused them to disappear from the site for an undetermined period of time, she added. They were restored in recent days to public view once the FBI learned they were missing, according to the FBI spokeswoman.

The old technical glitch again.

Are these really the untouched original photos?

Just wondering.

Also check out the only 3 minutes of a missile hitting the Pentagon - - - even YouTube calls it a missile >

Husha, Husha, we all fall down.

Controlled demolition in Vancouver, the Marine Building - 

perfectly executed

Didn't want to be alone so went too, World Trade 7 -

perfectly executed

Gravity, the REAL film.

On April 3rd, 2013, Chechnya's tallest building, a luxury hotel caught fire and burned for 29 hours before it was put out. The building was completely destroyed but did not collapse. This raises many questions as to how World Trade Center 7 could have collapsed on 9/11 with only small fires on a couple of floors?
 

In one photo we see a building almost completely engulfed by fire, which was still standing after 29 hours of intense fire; in the video we see hardly any fire at all, yet that building collapsed, within a few hours, at free fall speed, into it's own footprint!
Fires in high rise buildings have repeatedly left them standing, WT7 was not hit by aircraft, soaked with aviation fuel, or suffered the intensity of raging fires, yet no one has answered the question of why it collapsed at all.

YouTube message after removing this film - This video has been removed for violating YouTube's policy on hate speech. Learn more about combating hate speech in your country.

 

The film is the WT7 building on fire and falling down from what millions now agree is controlled demolition. No other steel framed building has EVER come down from fire!

 It is never too late to find Truth.

TV lies? 

best-911-video-ever

Loose Change - watch before they delete this one too.  Also deleted by YouTube which has a twisted view of what hate speech is when it is a report on a world wide tragic event, and virtually all investigative directions point at a secret government action. Here is the current location of 'Loose Change', an accurate account of what happened on Sept 11, 2001. This would be necessary viewing for anyone who cares about reality in history -  https://thoughtmaybe.com/?s=Loose+Change .

Best 9/11 Video Ever

Why are these two so happy? 
Because they've duped America.
Take only a 4:56 minutes to see this, you owe it to yourself.

Don't believe if you don't want to, but don't deny yourself asking a question either.

Call home in midflight on your cell - soon you can

Virgin Atlantic has just announced that you will be able to make cell phone calls in midflight from 20 of their planes!
Only six passengers at a time will be able to use the system, which the airline says is intended "for use in exceptional situations." Passengers will be able to send text messages, make a call or access email on mobile devices.
Initially, the service, on Airbus A330-300 planes which utilize a satellite connection, will only be available for customers of European cell phone providers O2 and Vodafone and U.S. carrier T-Mobile.  The new system - basically akin to a roving, airborne cell tower - features picocell technology provided by AeroMobile, and the vendor states that it doesn’t interfere with aircraft avionics.
(currently within 250 miles of US airspace it is not allowed to make a cell call)




There was no comment from the NSA, NORAD, CIA, the FBI, the Secret Service or any other government agency including the White House on how those mysterious in-air cell phone calls were supposedly made on September 11th, 2001 when it was considered by experts as impossible to do so at that time.




There was no comment from United Airlines either, who lost Flight 93 on September 11, 2001 into a field in Shanksville, Pennsylvania after numerous passengers allegedly made cell phone* calls while being hijacked, including the infamous Mark Bingham call to his mother.

ET, call home.




*not to be confused with airphone calls.

check out previous posts - 

from Sunday, July 15, 2007, commenting on the Maritz Research company study about cell phone use in midflight  becoming available soon - http://caterwauls.blogspot.ca/2007/07/cellphone-study-er-revelation.html
 
and from Monday, April 07, 2008, commenting on Air France's announcement of starting  trials of voice calls in midflight on an Airbus A318 - http://caterwauls.blogspot.ca/2008/04/new-cellphones-in-aircraft-in-flight.html

Suspicions and Watchers

9/11. So long ago. 2001.
Recently a story emerged from Reuters News Agency about human remains from that tragic date. These remains were supposed to be cremated by the U.S. Military's Main Mortuary. The remains supposedly came from the Pentagon and Pennsylvania crash site of one of the hijacked airliners.


Retired General John Abizaid who was in charge said it is unclear how many victim's partial remains were disposed of in this manner. And doubted there was a way to find out.
The incident is certain to further undermine the reputation of the Dover mortuary after last year’s revelations that it mishandled the remains of American war dead. This included losing body parts twice and allowing the partial remains of at least 274 soldiers to be dumped in a Virginia landfill.
The report suggested that the human remains from the Sept. 11 attacks - those that could not be tested or identified - were essentially treated as medical waste.

My post is not to tell you about these goings on, but the effort in following the story.
It was on a Google News page with the heading - Some September 11 dead's remains ended in landfill - the heading is underlined as an URL So clicking it should lead to the article in full.
Not so easy. It leads to a separate page, a 'redirect notice'. The ominous URL is now hugely long, taking two lines, with a separate URL below to return you to the previous page. Assuming you no longer want to learn about the story.
But is it an effort to discourage you from going to and reading the story? Almost like a warning.

Are the so called Watchers still active after 11 years? Watching every article about 9/11 and discouraging efforts to follow stories about 9/11?

Recently on CraigsList a few posts about the World Trade Center destruction disappeared after one day. Flagged and removed. This still happens on many other opinion forums.
Try it yourself, post an opinion about the 9/11 event, controversial or not, and watch it disappear almost immediately.

Suspicious minds will always pursue a thread, however thin, and the Watchers seem to be still on the job with efforts to thwart this inquisitiveness.
Some of us are still seeking the truth.
Some of them are still seeking to suppress it.

the article

Conspiracies - Business as usual?

Why is it there are so many questions unanswered about terrorism?
9/11 has expanded itself into a huge ongoing controversy over the years simply because of unanswered questions. (if you want to know what they are because you've been in a cave for 10 years, refer to the link two posts below - Believe what you will ... but ... it goes to the now famous "Loose Change" video)

So now we have Northwest Airlines Flight 253 on Christmas day, flying from Amsterdam to Chicago. An attempted bombing and even though it seems someone has been arrested, there are many questions emerging from the incident.

1 - Some passengers (including Attorney Kurt Haskell) saw a well dressed man pressuring the ticket agent in Schiphol airport to allow another man (bomb man) onto the plane without a passport.
................ No one has released airport video to accept or refute this observation? Why not? You can be sure ALL ticket booths are constantly filmed and these two are recorded. Or not.

2 - The well dressed man and the bomb man went to a 'manager's office at the airport.
................ Why no info about this 'manager' or confirmation that the two were queried? Why isn't anyone answering how bomb man was able to board the aircraft?

3 - Someone sprang into action immediately that a fire emerged to subdue the bomb man and he was evidently taken to first class and handcuffed there.
................ No one seems to know who it was or who took charge of the fire bomb man? They say he was a Dutchman, but was he an Air marshal? If so why not tell the public? If not, where did the handcuffs come from?

4 - Once the plane landed, passengers were kept on the plane for 20 minutes but then allowed to get off with their carry-on baggage.

................ No one hurried the passengers off suspecting another bomb might have been on board? Or to protect a crime scene. And no one inspected the carry-on until hours later.
5 - While in the quarantined area, another man's bag was sniffed out by a bomb sniffing dog and taken to a separate room, then later led away in handcuffs.

................ Why did the FBI deny there even was another man questioned and then change their story five times after publicly aired comments by witnesses?
6 - Some man several rows back of the incident in the plane, was seen operating a video cam recording the whole action.

................ Why has this not come out about who he was or where that video might be?
7 - Another witness confirming Kurt Haskell's view of the Schiphol man says she is afraid to come forward.

................ Why?
8 - The well dressed man in Schiphol said his friend was from Sudan, when we now know he was from Nigeria and already identified by his own father to the CIA as a potential terrorist.
................ Why was no action taken in this regard?

9 - The media has seemingly expressed no desire to investigate, or even query anything about this event, except for a few independent websites and known instigators.
............... Why is mainstream media so reluctant to report on the biggest terrorism scare in 8 years?

Well, there are more questions emerging every day. And fewer answers. If the FBI had an air marshal on board, wouldn't they admit it? Even to reassure the public and inform other potential terrorists?
The problem emerging here, is that the conspiracy theorists get huge erections over stuff like this. And begin to sense a plan. All of these events seem to fit nicely into the idea that everything was known ahead of time. Hmm? Like another false flag operation?
If you knew there was no other bomb aboard, why even bother to search the plane? And letting the passengers sit for 20 minutes is okay too if there was no danger. Then letting them off with their carry-on is okay as well because it was all known ahead of time what was going down? And changing a story from the FBI almost every other day to counter what witnesses were saying is ... just odd.
So one conspiracy theorist told me that 'they' are wanting to keep terrorism front and centered in the minds of the populace to allow further restrictions to freedom. And that this young bomb man may be part of it all and will simply disappear somewhere into some prearranged protection system. Like, do this for us and you'll get American citizenship?

Why do these conspiracy ideas seems to nestle nicely into each other while the official stories fumble about? Is it just because truth is stranger than fiction?
Perhaps it is a natural suspicion in the subliminal minds of people based on a history of machiavellian intrigue going back to the beginnings of recorded secrets. And conspiracy theories are sometimes defined as an attempt to explain an event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people who have also managed to conceal their role.

It seems like business as usual in the conspiracy - counter conspiracy trade. I'm just watching for the next one.


Kurt Haskell's account of the Christmas Day, Northwest flight 253 ....
http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2010/01/latest-story-by-kurt-haskell.html