Friday, March 5, 2021

Still Interesting - MH370

 

MH370 once more.

New info has emerged regarding the actions on the night of 8 March 2014 when Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 flew into the night and disappeared. And became one of the biggest mysteries in modern aviation history. 239 people vanished.

Most investigations have been inconclusive about the disappearance. Searches in the South Indian Ocean have turned up nothing. But that area was chosen very quickly. Based on only one satellite data.

Could a clue be discovered by revisiting the passengers aboard list? 

There are a couple of intrigues: Two different passenger lists emerged (did anyone compare them?) and cargo of 200 lbs was added to the manifest after take-off? The two men who boarded MH370 in Kuala Lumpur with stolen passports, were deemed to be simply looking for asylum somewhere. But in China? They were both Iranian. They were already far from Iran, the opportunity for them to go anywhere was available. MH370 was bound for Beijing, China. Their fare was paid by an unidentified Iranian man who purchased two one-way tickets with cash. Pictures show both were young healthy men. (further mystery, several relations of some passengers were still able to hear the phones ringing when they called weeks later.)

Law enforcement officers around the world can check the validity of a travel document in seconds using Interpol databases of stolen and lost travel documents (SLTD). The SLTD database contains around 99 million records; these can be lost, stolen and revoked travel documents – such as passports, identity cards, visas and UN laissez-passer, and also stolen blank travel documents. How is it that this passport info was never queried with Interpol at the time? Another passenger was a flight engineer. One could suggest he could fly a Boeing 777.

Would the camera recordings in the waiting lounge for this flight reveal a connection between those three?

If a plane needed to be taken over and flown elsewhere, that could be accomplished by a capable pilot and two accomplices quite easily. Where exactly were those three men seated? If it was ordinary terrorism, the plane would just get crashed for the attention. Or directed somewhere and landed as a prize. But what if, for some reason, the entire plane was needed for something ELSE sinister? 

Four of five patent holders to new semi-conductor designs were aboard that plane. The invention was for military use, avionics, radar cloaking technology, missile guidance and other important uses which could be applied to electronic warfare. The patent had not been awarded yet, but was due within days. After the disappearance and the passengers considered deceased, the patent was awarded and now 100% owned by the fifth and surviving patent holder, Lord Jacob Rothschild, the British billionaire and suspected Elite Deep State world player. Do you consider that a coincidence?

Just before MH370 varied from a line north-east toward Vietnam over the South China Sea, the pilot said good night to Malaysian air traffic controllers (ATC) and at that precise moment, the transponders were shut off! So now the airplane was gone without suspicion from Malaysian airspace, and had no contact with Vietnamese ATC yet so was never questioned. A very clever time to shut down communication. Do I see a plot here? Yes! 

Now MH370 suddenly turned and reversed direction, then executed erratic maneuvers traveling south-west, back across Malaysia, changing altitude several times (ascending to high altitude can cause hypoxia, loss of oxygen to the brain, your drop-down passenger oxygen mask in a plane has about 20 seconds of use at 30,000 feet, then you are brain dead. But cockpit oxygen masks have an infinite supply. The action of a pilot is to drop into normally breathable air quickly. IF it is possible and if he still has control of the plane.) 

MH370 then flew low, some speculate 4000 ft, out over the Indian Ocean. The conclusion from the investigation is that the electronics of MH370 were switched off manually. The plane passed Penang and headed into the open ocean. SATCOM disabled. Was it evading other radars? Evidently yes. The aircraft made adjustments to avoid commercial flights passing nearby. Autopilot would not have. And the transponders were not turned on again until miles later well out at sea. Then INMARSAT replied with a ‘handshake’, establishing contact again. But was that contact with the SAME MH370 aircraft? Most agree the plane was being human piloted and was not flying autopilot. So could a different plane take over as MH370 with a programmed transponder while the real one escaped to a secret destination?

MH370 was seen on military radar in Malaysia, approaching Penang, although the ID of the plane was unknown, but they still never scrambled Malaysian air force planes to intercept and find out who it was? Why not? 

 


At this point the craft thought to be MH370 had about six and a half hours of fuel aboard, but no one knows for sure how much fuel could have been loaded. It was a Boeing 777-2H6ER, ER means Extended Range! It was not reported missing until four hours later when it should have touched down in Beijing. By this time, air traffic control started searching for electronic information.

Theories were already being invented. I suggest the Boeing plane could have landed on Diego Garcia, the US airbase leased from Britain. Pundits said that could never happen as it would be shot down. The TV talking heads never thought that it might be flying there as expected. (earlier Satellite pics of the airport at D.G. show lots of US Military aircraft there. But subsequent looks show nothing but empty runways, as if they have been Photoshopped out, the tarmac doesn't even have tire marks on it now!) Can we assume that if the plane never just ran out of fuel and crashed into the ocean, that it was expected somewhere? French investigators' reports ruled out mechanical failure and dismissed a pilot suicide mission.

All the news TV channels were full of so called experts endlessly grabbing face time while plotting the path of the jet, and virtually all of them pointed to the South Ocean. Concluded? Why?  If we could review those talking heads on TV the nights following the event, could we sense suspicious activity by one or two of the 'experts'? It only takes little effort to steer a conversation.

Now comes my part of where it went, Pakistan or Iran? Or? There are airports along those coasts, in Pakistan, Mogadishu, Somalia, Mozambique and with the heavy air traffic in Karachi, it might be possible to land a plane right there as a military plane without question if transponders were disabled? How many times have we heard of a CIA plane landing somewhere under a cloak of secrecy? The coast of Iran also has secluded airport possibilities. As well as Oman etc. Anywhere with a capable runway, and perhaps the possibility to hide a 777. Look at the countries within those circles.

But Diego Garcia is still my main focus.


The satellite identified a plane but not exact position, it could only determine distance from the satellite. Then a circle was used to form arcs of possible location, based on time and distance. The outer circle in the picture shows the suggested range based on fuel load. The belief that MH370 traveled south-east into the Southern Ocean could be totally wrong. Hence why they started the serious searching there. But why only look south? Those parts of the circle, as seen in the illustration, could be in hundreds of other places. Not necessarily south and not in the sea. Manipulation?

Australia has a facility at Perth to hear ocean happenings thousands of miles away. There are listening stations everywhere underwater, hydrophones. They can hear events that create an Acoustic Gravity Wave, but reported nothing unusual like a plane crashing into the ocean. However, two louder hums from hydrophones heard something. Not strong enough to be a crashing airplane plunging into the sea, But would they hear a Boeing 777 flying very low passing above them, close enough to cause a spike in the recorded graph tape? There is a listening station on Diego Garcia but when investigators asked for recorded information, they were told some hydrophones had been shut off and 25 minutes were missing! WTF?

One source of a signal was identified as being in the Arabian Sea! The opposite direction of the suspected area of the flight and the consequent search field called the 7th arc. If we know the exact location of the two underwater devices, wouldn't we also have a direction of whatever caused those spikes in the listening sound recordings by a time lapse? Could it have been our 777 flying to Iran or Pakistan low enough to avoid some radars but not listening devices?

So it is not a stretch to believe a major airliner could be stolen right out of the sky. Electronics disabled to cover its escape to wherever, while a second decoy plane using the MH370 transponder codes could fly off in any direction to point searchers purposely in the wrong direction. Transponder signal codes could have been programmed into a different plane mimicking MH370. This could be any aircraft, even a small private or military jet. And there are thousands of fleet planes flying around the world every day without notice of who owns them, who is in them or what cargo they carry. Even a drone might be programmed to fly straight south and ping before dropping into the ocean. You know of course that military drones flying over Afghanistan are piloted by guys in air-conditioned comfort in Kansas or somewhere within the USA. What they are now calling over-the-horizon action. Nefarious? You bet it is.

All the while a silent ghostly real MH370 flies on to a secret, intended destination in a preprogrammed direction. With or without 239 alive passengers.

It is believed by the Malaysian government, that flight 370 was under human control with altered headings which were input manually as it disappeared into aviation history. The possibilities are endless and not just within the Southern Ocean.

 

 
 So where did it go? Who engineered this theft? And why?

 

 It never ends does it?

Addenda1;

There are now other websites suspecting that MH370 went to Diego Garcia. And even more who have taken the circle of distance and proposed that MH370 could even have gone farther!

The problem now is, that many of these sites that question the narrative in blogs or forums, seem to be mysteriously unavailable. 'We cannot display that page' - 'Unable to access site.' - or just that irritating little revolving circle pretending it is trying to load your search topic. Someone somewhere, doesn't want any of us question askers to get any kind of answers. The cover-up is way bigger than people can imagine. And we can only ask why? Many of us saw it on the very day of the disappearance when all the 'experts' obediently gathered to steer us in any direction but the one we suspect as true, and it is NOT in the South Ocean.

Addenda2;

What holds back many people from exploring this enigma, is that they cannot face the thoughts, that outwardly normal people could do such a thing as purposely kill 239 people to advance a secret plan. But others would suggest it has happened throughout history and not all the bad guys are from 'Spectre', some times they live among us as God fearing persons. But we don't know which God they follow. Some folks are still investigating Shanksville.

 

 

Friday, December 11, 2020

Repost from 2004

 

Sunday, December 05, 2004

Happy something or other ....

Merry Christmas. Say it. Mean it. Resist this ridiculous effort to change what is a religious time of year to something else. Why are some trying to change it? It is the commercial chain stores, Macys in New York, owned by Federated Stores, wants us to say Happy Holidays or Seasons Greetings as though it was Easter break, or something else, because in THEIR interpretation of Christmas, they THINK that other religions will be offended. Offended. Like Jews, Muslims and Buddhists will refuse to shop. And shopping is more important than real merry Christmas. I notice the Hudsons Bay has no 'Merry Christmas' either, are they buying into the sham? The Bay is being bought by Target from America. Are they trying to suck up to their new indifferent to Christmas bosses? There is an organized campaign growing in the states to boycott Macys. Not a bad idea. Even if you're not religious. It's Christmas and it's Christ's birthday for Chrissakes!

Given the choice, I'd rather boycott Macys and the Bay than Jesus Christ.

Sunday, November 22, 2020

Repost - still interesting - still a mystery - still questions

 After fifty long years, the huge 26 volume Warren Commission Report is still unbelievable to 85% of the American people. And we are no closer to understanding the What, Why, and Who of the events. Except to suggest it was a coup d'etat of democracy. But it is not going away. Tidbits of information about the perps, if indeed they are the perps, continue to emerge. Even the side issue here about Officer Tippit remains of high interest. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
from November 23, 2012

49 years and counting .... November 24

It seems that even after this long long time it would be apropos to repost a couple of things about that infamous day in history. There are still a few reads you can research yourself. But even if you do, they still lead to nothing but even more questions about what actually happened that day in Dallas ..... 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
from November 24, 2010

Today in History - November 24

Lee Harvey Oswald.
While the world was still reeling at the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, we saw the alleged perpetrator of the crime, caught and killed only two days later, and on national TV!
And these many years on we can only marvel at the speed with which his apprehension for the crimes happened. And the positive assertion that Oswald was undoubtedly the lone killer of Officer Tippit and Kennedy.
All these instant conclusions would be astounding even in todays era of nanosecond web communication. Yet over these years so many nagging doubts still evoke questions.

Oswald was supposed to have shot Kennedy from a 6th floor coign of vantage in the Texas Schoolbook Depository, with a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle. But first it was identified as a 7.65 Italian Mauser, by sherrifs and FBI Special Agents. Affidavits were signed. Then it became a 6.5 Carcano rifle. Why? Because the FBI discovered that Oswald HAD purchased a Carcano, but NOT a Mauser. And even other rifles are now mentioned. And it took a world class marksman from the Army to nearly duplicate the 3 shots in 4.5 second feat! Other trained US Marine snipers said it could not be done.
And an almost perfect bullet 'appeared' on the stretcher bearing the President's body. A bullet that went through TWO bodies. That looks as if the Lone Ranger put it there!

Oswald was even identified by someone who SAW him up there from across the street! Is that believeable today?

Oswald was supposedly seen being questioned by Tippit shortly after leaving his job and taking to the streets. Witnesses said they saw him shoot Tippit. They even saw him REloading his handgun while fleeing! Does that sound like a frightened killer? Yet other witnesses said another car pulled up, a man got out and shot Tippit and then roared away! Someone else saw two men who were NOT Oswald. Witnesses even identified a different assailant as heavy set, wearing a long overcoat. Many witnesses claimed intimidations and threats about their testimonys. Several eye-witnesses died soon after.
The Warren Commission ignored most of it.

And what was Officer Tippit up to on the hour before he died? Why was he far out of his patrol area? Why did he suddenly rush to 10th Street and stop to make a phone call in a cafe but only listened and said nothing? Why did he seem panicked when he made the call? He left his car radio at a crucial time. Then he was seen cruising very slowly. Why was Tippit known in the area he died in? Some witnesses thought he lived nearby. But it was miles from his patrol area and his home?

How did anyone know Oswald's path of exit? Was it coincidence? Happenstance? Or enemy action? Officer Tippit was directed exactly where to go, minutes after the murder. Then radioed back when he was in position. Why was Tippit directed to 10th St? Was he? The Dallas police lieutenant who may have directed Tippit that day, Harry Dean Thomas, married his widow three years later.
The shells from the shooting were gathered by policeman, J.M. Poe, and he marked them with his initials, however the shell casings eventually entered into evidence had no such markings.

Oswald went to his rooming house first. Who were the two policemen who stopped in front, gave two horn honks and went away? Then he went to a movie theatre. Why did he go there instead of staying on a bus and getting far away? Was he under a prearranged instruction to go to that theatre? Part of a plan to have him where someone wanted him? Did someone give him a revolver there? Perhaps the very revolver just used to kill Tippit? Perhaps by the very person who DID kill Tippit? The revolver in his possession was fully loaded with no empty chambers. And he had no additional ammunition with him. So if Oswald shot Tippit four times, and REloaded, then he must have had only had four extra bullets with him? Seems too odd, doesn't it?

Oswald was constant in his claim that he was a patsy. He was innocent. He never shot anybody. And more than one scholar who has gone through the whole case has said the Mexico and Soviet Union implications could have easily pointed to Oswald being a CIA spy.
Alas, all these years later we are still suspicious, yet nowhere near advanced in our factuals about how it happened. The circumstances seem just too complex. The evidence now too scattered. Diffused. Lost. Misinformation and disinformation. Indeed, but we have more questions than ever.
His actions seem to be a response to suddenly realizing he had been set up. Confusion, desperation, the compounding of events leading him to take a predetermined escape route as his only hope. A route designed by who?

Lee Harvey Oswald was never actually charged with killing the Presdient.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and from September 27, 2011

This day in history - - - September 27

(1963 – 64) The Warren Commission. A group appointed by Pres. Lyndon B. Johnson to investigate the circumstances surrounding President John F. Kennedy's slaying and the shooting of his (alleged) assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald. It was chaired by Earl Warren and included two U.S. senators, two U.S. congressmen, and two former public officials.
After months of investigation, it reported that Kennedy was killed by Oswald's rifle shots from the Texas School Book Depository and that Oswald's murder by Jack Ruby two days later was not part of a conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy.
Its findings were later questioned in a number of books and articles and in a special congressional committee report in 1979, though no conclusive contradictory evidence was found.

JD Tippit

One of those first books, Rush to Judgment, by lawyer Mark Lane, pointed out that the conclusions in the Summery, those few pages that most people and reporters read, had little to do with the volumes of actual evidence in the content.
Today a believer of this, 'Oswald alone', conclusion is rare. And because that summery seemed falsified, it berthed a lifetime of conspiracy theories about the President's death.
Even following the interesting side story of the trail of Officer Tippit on that day and you might join the legions of disbelievers.

The members of that Warren Commission were -

- Earl Warren - Chief Justice of the United States. Eisenhower offered Warren the post of solicitor general, with the promise of a seat on the Supreme Court. But before it was announced, Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson unexpectedly died in September 1953 and Eisenhower replaced him with Warren. As Chief Justice of the United States some said many of his decisions were 'inappropriate'.

- Hale Boggs - Died mysteriously in a plane crash while flying over remote Alaska in October, 1972 . Wreckage never found. In April 1971 he had made a speech on the floor of the House in which he strongly attacked J. Edgar Hoover and the whole of the FBI.

- Gerald Ford - Future President. Ford commented in his own report that the CIA destroyed or kept from investigators critical secrets connected to the assassination.

- John Sherman Cooper - In the general election in 1954 Cooper was defeated by Alben W. Barkley a Democrat who had been Vice President under Harry S. Truman but Barkley subsequently died, and Cooper was elected to fill his unexpired term in 1956.

- John J. McCloy - He was initially skeptical of the lone gunman theory, but a trip to Dallas with Allen Dulles, an old friend also serving on the Commission, in the spring of 1964 to visit the scene of the assassination convinced him of the case against Lee Harvey Oswald.

- Allen Welsh Dulles - Director of the CIA. It evolved under his directorship into a team of assassins. One member, Frank Sturgis, claimed: "this assassination group (Operation 40) would upon orders, naturally, assassinate either members of the military or the political parties of the foreign country that you were going to infiltrate, and if necessary some of your own members." (Sturgis was also one of the Watergate burglars) Dulles and his staff were forced to resign in September 1961 when President Kennedy reportedly said he wanted to "splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds."

The Warren report's lack of candor furthered antigovernment cynicism, which in turn stimulated conspiracy theorists who propounded any number of alternative scenarios, all mutually contradictory, and all going strong today.


Who can you trust?
.

In a new revelation by Jackie Kennedy she recently revealed her suspicions of LBJ. And we all know she married Ari Onassis simply because he was the one man in the world who could actually protect her from an 'unexpected' and mysterious death. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 .... back to today ....

And an even more recent revelation suggests that Jackie Kennedy/Onassis recorded several tapes before she died. And they are somewhere. Waiting to be revealed. It is further proposed by some researchers, that Oswald was a paid asset of the FBI.
Arlen Specter, (later a Senator) was assistant counsel to the Warren Commission (recommended by Gerald Ford) and came up with the single bullet theory, which was readily adopted because having Connally and Kennedy shot by two separate bullets in such a short time frame would indicate TWO assassins and a conspiracy! Convenient, huh? Why did Specter miss so many obvious followup questions to the witnesses? Unanswered questions only result in more questions.
In recent years, there have been suggestions that some secret sponsored shadow cell has plans for a coup d'etat of the American Government, even that 9/11 may have been the precursor.

And there are also those who also believe the coup was already accomplished on November 22, 1963!

But just investigating through 'open source' the one aspect of Officer Tippit is an interesting exercise and takes you well away from the 49 years of spin and cover up about JFK. Go ahead, try it. At the very least you'll have a fascinating read, way better than TV fiction. And you'll involve yourself in history.


start here - - -
                                 Dallas Police Officer J.D. Tippet 

                                 Officer Tippit timeline

                                 JD Tippit homepage    

                                 Officer Tippit's autopsy                   

(link 1 and 4 were removed by someone, but I put them back) 


Follow the fascinating timeline and perhaps you will come up with more questions too: like why did the Davis sisters believe he lived in the nearby apartment house? Who DID live there to cause Tippit to be there often? Why was he speeding around frantically in the minutes after JFK was shot? Was he supposed to intercept Oswald? Why was he on West 10th Street when he was thought to be miles away at the Dealey Plaza by the overpass? How many contradictions may already be within the transcripts of accounts, interviews and events? Is there one fact somewhere, just waiting for a new eye to find it? Is there one sentence somewhere that says, 'This cannot be, therefore that must be?' 

They can't hide ALL the trails leading to truth. We finally learned the identity of deepthroat, proving that Watergate lie. Anything can still happen.

And one thing about a coup d'etat, they don't all reveal themselves in a momentary flash through smoke and fire and violence ... they can emerge in stealth over many years. 




(Thanks to William M. Drenas  [Tippit Timeline],  for communicating with me and others interested researchers for never exhausting their efforts in the search for truth)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Will there ever be discovered that grain of proof? Who knows, but some won't stop looking.

 

 

Sunday, October 4, 2020

Why Dog people are the worst

 I am not alone. Here's a recent event -

    This woman decided that the lice and maybe mange disease she found in her dog hair was better left on a public park bench than in her house. Do these kinds of people ever wash their dog after it poops? Before they allow the animal on a bench that a young mother would like to relax on with her baby? Or an older couple to pause in their daily walk? What kind of mentality is this?

 

When questioned, people like this only say, "Oh no, my dog is clean, watch him kiss me!" Without a blink that he might have just licked another dog's bum before he laps her face!  

 

Then there are the ones who walk right in front of you, while talking on their phones, (or pretending to) and not looking at Rover poop right there in your space. Others just look up at the sky while it defiles the grass. Look at it this way, if it was up to the dog, he would go off into the bush and do it, he's got some class and a little pride, but not you. you've got the poor little bugger on a leash and he is forced to shit in front of everyone. These folks never pull the dog away from your area, allowing it to sniff and circle right as if they had no control.

Went to visit friends for a summer get together, about 10 people in their living room. A woman in the middle of us all encouraging the dog to run everywhere, bouncing off the furniture. I said to the host woman, "Your dog is very active." She answered quietly, "It's not my dog."  OMG, the person was invited to a friend's home and brought her freaking DOG? And then exercised it and let it tear up her carpet? How cute is that!

Some get what they deserve though - leave him in the car while you dash for a latte. Sure.

And one lady, took virtually ALL the doggie bags from the park dispenser into her purse. Maybe the dog was in there too but I didn't see it. Wonder if her husband's lunch smells bad? Is that a peanut butter sandwich or not?

Another guy got a chihuahua. He took it everywhere. Even golfing. Three of the foursome wanted him to let it run so they could aim at it. Were willing to sacrifice a whole box of new balls! 

And how often do you see that macho Dodge Ram pick-up driver with Pookie on his lap, a total distraction as the animal squirms around, putting the lives of all pedestrians in danger because this guy can't steer or brake hard or the little piece of furry shit will slide of his lap and get under that brake pedal.

Here's more - A guy in a nice suit took his dog out before work. A rare bit of empty grass downtown. One day he met a young girl as he was walking the critter. For a few times after, they passed and talked, a budding romance. Until one time he was on his way back home when he met her, they chatted, he had a bag of poop in his hand. Never saw them together after that. 

I knew this lady in a high rise apartment building, she was way too busy watching Oprah to take him out to do his business. It was a two bedroom with a bath and a shower. Well, the shower was a great convenience, the dog just hopped into the stall, and all Miss Bliss had to do was pass by during commercials and turn on the shower for a while. What a flush! But it was okay, she didn't have to feed him Kibbles and Bits and could do soft food! 

Speaking of high rise condos, they all have that slow elevator. You're going to work in a perfectly good suit, or wife has a lovely dress on. When here she comes, the lady from the sixth holding Muffin squirming and lurching in every direction. She's so excited she pisses on your shoe! The dog, not the lady. And leaps on you to get a pat on the head when you'd rather it be a hammer to the head! Tears your pants, or wifey's linen skirt,  and worse for your woman, the dreaded crotch sniff! With a wet nose! And now she is going out with a dark spot. Right ... there!

I think Oprah may do this soon - "And tonight, everyone in our audience goes home with a BRAND
NEW DOG!" (sorts of cheers)

How's that? A free dog. Really? Yeah, no shit. Er .... well .... um, maybe some, but it is only lil droplets. And we know that Oprah person can't wait to take her dog to restaurants so she can overwhelm your hygienic protests by telling you how she got it.

So in the Forties we had gum chewers. Everywhere on the streets, those circles of spit-out gum hardened on the sidewalk. Then it became smokers, butts everywhere. Now it is dog poop. But they only pick it up by the clean end, and leave the residue in the grass so your children can never run barefoot again. Too bad. 

There are three reasons that, even if you're desperate for friends, you should reject some potentials: 1- He or she smokes. Them kind are not bright enough to know any better, forgive them but don't befriend them.  2- The person is wearing a Tilly hat. No explanation needed on this one. and  3 - He or she has a dog. Why wonder if she will turn up for dinner and feed it on her lap at your table? And you know it is going to bite you sooner or later.

I have nothing against Lassie, or Rin Tin Tin, or Astra, they are great in the movies, but with a proper dog wrangler. Just don't try Mr. Piddles out on me.

This is a dog day afternoon. With Alpo? Nope gotta be dry. Balanced for health? Full of nutrition? Vitamins? Nope, just pick-up-able. No more canned food, too moist. 

My dog used to get the cooked turkey neck at Christmas with some gravy and veggies in the bowl. He wagged his tail, walked around it several times, and smiled his thanks at us for the treat before eating it slowly and with much appreciation. 

Then we sent him out to the back yard.


                                               Don't think he will be cute or small forever.




Thursday, April 9, 2020

Death List?

On Saturday, August 10th, 2019,  multimillionaire Jeffrey Epstein, the highest profile prisoner in US custody, was found dead in his prison cell in Manhattan.

This occurred the day after two thousand previously sealed court documents involving the Jeffrey Epstein child sex abuse case were released to the public. The documents described how Bill Clinton held a private party on Jeffrey Epstein’s pedophile island. Clinton made at least 27 trips on Jeffrey Epstein’s private plane. Most of those flights were with underage girls. 
Despite a previous attempt on his life just three weeks before the prison guards skipped the 30 minute required checks on Epstein’s cell that night. Early next morning they found him dead. Jeffrey Epstein is the latest in a long list of Clinton family associates and acquaintances who died mysteriously or committed suicide before their public testimony.
In 2016 CBS Las Vegas posted a list of Bill and Hillary Clinton associates alleged to have died under mysterious circumstances.
Here is that list.
1- James McDougal – Clintons convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation.
2 – Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown. The murder happened just after she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House.
3 – Vince Foster – Former White House counselor and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.
4 – Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors. The rest of the people on the plane also died. A few days later the Air Traffic controller committed suicide.
5 – C. Victor Raiser, II – Raiser, a major player in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.
6 – Paul Tulley – Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotel room in Little Rock, September 1992. Described by Clinton as a “dear friend and trusted adviser”.
7 – Ed Willey – Clinton fundraiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.
8 – Jerry Parks – Head of Clinton’s gubernatorial security team in Little Rock. Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock. Park’s son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton. He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.
9 – James Bunch – Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a “Black Book” of people which contained names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas
10 – James Wilson – Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater.
11 – Kathy Ferguson – Ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, was found dead in May 1994, in her living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she were going somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.
12 – Bill Shelton – Arkansas State Trooper and fiancee of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancee, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancee.
13 – Gandy Baugh – Attorney for Clinton’s friend Dan Lassater, died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994. His client was a convicted drug distributor.
14 – Florence Martin – Accountant & sub-contractor for the CIA, was related to the Barry Seal, Mena, Arkansas, airport drug smuggling case. He died of three gunshot wounds.
15 – Suzanne Coleman – Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.
16 – Paula Grober – Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one car accident.
17 – Danny Casolaro – Investigative reporter, investigating Mena Airport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists, apparently, in the middle of his investigation.
18 – Paul Wilcher – Attorney investigating corruption at Mena Airport with Casolaro and the 1980 “October Surprise” was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993, in his Washington DC apartment had delivered a report to Janet Reno 3 weeks before his death.
19 – Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death from his Arlington, Virginia apartment balcony August 15, 1993. He was investigating the Morgan Guaranty scandal.
20 – Barbara Wise – Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause of death: Unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Her bruised, naked body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.
21 – Charles Meissner – Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.
22 – Dr. Stanley Heard – Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton‘s advisory council personally treated Clinton’s mother, stepfather and brother.
23 – Barry Seal – Drug running TWA pilot out of Mena Arkansas, death was no accident.
24 – Johnny Lawhorn, Jr. – Mechanic, found a check made out to Bill Clinton in the trunk of a car left at his repair shop. He was found dead after his car had hit a utility pole.
25 – Stanley Huggins – Investigated Madison Guaranty. His death was a purported suicide and his report was never released.
26 – Hershell Friday – Attorney and Clinton fundraiser died March 1, 1994, when his plane exploded.
27 – Kevin Ives & Don Henry – Known as “The boys on the track” case. Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. A controversial case, the initial report of death said, due to falling asleep on railroad tracks. Later reports claim the 2 boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.
THE FOLLOWING PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES/HENRY CASE:
28 – Keith Coney – Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck, 7/88.
29 – Keith McMaskle – Died, stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988
30 – Gregory Collins – Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.
31 – Jeff Rhodes – He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.
32 – James Milan – Found decapitated. However, the Coroner ruled his death was due to natural causes.
34 – Richard Winters – A suspect in the Ives/Henry deaths. He was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.
THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE ALSO DEAD -
35 – Major William S. Barkley, Jr.
36 – Captain Scott J . Reynolds
37 – Sgt. Brian Hanley
38 – Sgt. Tim Sabel
39 – Major General William Robertson
40 – Col. William Densberger
41 – Col. Robert Kelly
42 – Spec. Gary Rhodes
43 – Steve Willis
44 – Robert Williams
45 – Conway LeBleu
46 – Todd McKeehan
And the most recent, Seth Rich, the DC staffer murdered and “robbed” (of nothing) on July 10. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange claims he had info on the DNC email scandal.
Not Included in this list are the 4 heroes killed in Benghazi.

And today you can add multi-millionaire Jeffrey Epstein to the list.

Some people have this list at over 100. 


And don't forget that after John Kennedy Jr. died in that mysterious plane crash, that Hillary Clinton then won the Senate seat he would have gone for. 

Interesting, huh? Convenient too.





Saturday, May 25, 2019

Court rules

So the BC Appeals Court has decided that Alberta can send whatever they like through a pipe they will build from Edmonton and the Alberta Tar Sands, into and through British Columbia, crossing land and stream on the way right into downtown Vancouver! 
BC cannot use environmental protection laws to stop the process Trans Mountain wants to build and has already started building in anticipation of a favorable ruling. Just like predicted. 

As intended, the pipeline will terminate right on Burrard Inlet in Burnaby. At the largest port on the West Coast and within tidal reach of every sandy beach, Stanley Park and virtually all communities in Metro Vancouver. You remember the pipeline that the Americans were desperate to get rid of and would have taken 10 cents on the dollar for? And Justin Trudeau and his addled Liberals bought it for twice its value. And that is only part.


Your neighborhood?
Tanker traffic will quadruple and have to navigate the tides and narrow channels on its way out to the Pacific Ocean. Past English Bay, Georgia Straight, our Gulf Islands and the America San Juan islands and Victoria.
We are told there is no risk of a spill. Its all okay folks. We have never had a real answer to what happens in that event and some only assume that a spill in the BC Mountains would just release the pipeline product into the streams and rivers and it would find its own way to the Pacific. And bitumen doesn't float away on water, it sinks to the bottom. 

Leaking into arable land is another scenario. BC has only 4 percent of it's land available for farming. 

But pipeline company and oil company executives tell us don't worry, we're looking after it. This from companies who cannot explain why BC gasoline prices are 20% higher here than everywhere else in the country.
And these companies only talk about a spill on BC lands on the way to the terminal. They can not have any guarantee of the tankers that would visit here. After pumping it into a tanker in Burnaby they have no responsibility!


above the Burnaby terminal & tank farm! Don't light a match!
We had a small spill in English Bay a while ago, and the TV stations were covering it for hours before any attempt was made to contain the sheen of oil in the water. 
Mainly because the Federal government had shut down the Coast Guard on the West Coast! Not only that, once blame was established, and the tanker company was billed for the cost of cleanup, it only offered to pay a small percentage of the costs! 

In case you were wondering, Exxon oil has not paid all the costs or fines of their Valdez spill 30 years later! Their retainer lawyers are seeing to that!
The BP spill in the gulf of Mexico has resulted in a huge dead zone where nothing can live or grow again! No shrimp, no fish, not even seaweed! And all the while the Deep Water Horizon was leaking underwater the CEO of the corporation was lying through his teeth about what was going on down there. And even told the President of America and the US Navy to butt out! And they did. 
The Kalamazoo river spill is ongoing as the heavy crude in that spill continues to pollute and the company makes many returns to dredge again. No mention of fish populations or tainted water. And there are hundreds of pipeline spills all over America where pipelines ruptured and destroyed communities.


How long until someone knew about this?
Which brings us to exactly what would spill. The court decision says that Alberta can ship oil through BC whether we like it or not. Now there might be a chink in their armor here. What defines oil?
As it is intended right now, what will come through that pipeline to Vancouver, is NOT oil, or heavy crude even, is it bitumen, a gravelly mixture of tar like substance that will not flow through a pipe across the Rockies.

So the oil company needs to make that tar sand product pump-able, and they dilute it with heated water and certain chemicals to make it liquid. It is now called dilbit, diluted bitumen. The stickler here, is that no oil company will reveal what chemicals they use to treat the dilbit, that information is a trade secret. What some have learned is that whatever chemicals are used to liquify the piped product are surely carcinogenic and should be nowhere near human communities along the route of the pipeline. And I have not heard a single so-called reporter ask what happens to that so-called water. This is often called a 'scientific uncertainty'. Sort of like Nixon Talk, when he called a lie, a 'terminological inexactitude'!

Do you see the problem here? How can our first responders, who will have to react to pipeline breaks, product spills, clean-ups and possible fires etc, be able to attack the toxic problem if they have no idea what the product contains? Firemen say all the time that if they don't know what is in that burning building they are not going to send in guys or gals to investigate when a threat to life exists. How many HazMat teams need to be standing by? Some products in that dilbit mix can be benzine, tuluene and hexane. Toxic to the environment and downright dangerous to people!


HazMat procedures for workers, what about us?
And also the Court ruled that an oil pipeline can be built through BC and used, but it did say an OIL pipeline. They never thought on the idea that hazardous chemicals were being piped across some of the most pristine areas of British Columbia. Could they pipe cyanide through it? What onus does that present to our Federal Government responsibilities? Will BC have an inspection point at our border with Alberta to analyze what the hell is passing in that pipe? And a shut-off valve if needed?

So meanwhile, the powers-that-be keep saying it is okay, Canada needs it. So put your money where your mouth is Alberta and Canada, give us a fund of about a billion dollars for a fix if needed. We'll use the interest to train for disaster response.

This sort of smacks of what the Federal government did when the Lac-Megantic rail disaster occurred, resulting in oil fires and explosions that killed 42 people and destroyed all but three of the downtown buildings. The government enacted a law stating that railroads now had to inform communities when dangerous cargo was moving through their towns. Sounds good huh?
But wait, they only have to tell you up to a YEAR AFTER those goods have passed by!

The question remains; Can a people be exposed to danger by a court ruling?

You trying to keep the faith too? I am at the edge of losing mine.

And I haven't even mentioned endangered Orcas or already dwindling BC wild salmon runs yet! Fish don't swim too good in sludge. Trees don't grow either.



Links -

http://bitchesnbelches.blogspot.com/2018/04/top-20-oil-spills-from-pipelines-since.html

http://bitchesnbelches.blogspot.com/2014/04/tar-sands-again.html





Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Building 7 commits suicide

The before pic

 
WT7 before pic



World Trade Seven suicided
 you must watch this

 Sure and it is true, Dick Cheney told me so ........ the d on the end of suicide is NOT a typo.

The term has come into colloquial use because hundreds of people have been suicided since 9/11, witnesses to something mostly, many by shooting themselves twice, some in the back of the head.



And you trusted BBC news too didn't you? Sure, we all did ... until that day. Click this link for the 'on the moment' coverage by BBC's Jane Standley and wonder about the link suddenly scrambling itself and wonder WHY it begins to scramble?



 watch this one too



Is that an agenda or what? Do you still trust BBC news? These so-called news people people are being totally duped and controlled. Do you think someone was calling out in panic, "Oh no, it isn't down yet, kill that BBC feed!" Did BBC air their response before they were supposed to? What was the script for Jane, and when did she get it?

And you have the nerve to ridicule conspiracy theorists? hahaha.


To some it is too painful to remember, but to others, too painful to forget.



NOTA BENE!  2021. There is such a thing now happening on posts, articles, social media that is known as 'Stealth Editing', where those who may have written something, or others working on their behalf to an agenda, go back to the articles they can access and make changes in favor of whomever needs a better picture of what they have really done. This is why so many articles disappear over time, or suddenly take on a different tone or intent to what was originally posted. It is the changing of history.


Thursday, January 17, 2019

Hey Big Spender ♪♪

Canucks' Jim Benning has ways of getting rid of the team owners' money! One believes the Aquilini brothers can afford it.

How to spend must be in the Hockey GM's manual -

Loui Ericksson - few goals since signed - 6.3 MILLION dollars a year for 4 more years!

Three mediocre Free Agents signed last year - Antoine Rouselle, (penalty leader) Tim Schaller, Jay Beagle, all have limited ice time - all older, all on 4 YEAR contracts.

Canucks still paying half of Roberto Luongo's 10 million dollar salary while he plays in Florida.

Canucks paying Sam Gagner's wages while he plays in the AHL for a team NOT related to Utica, the teams' AHL farm team. Maybe checking Canucks' young prospects if he plays against the Comets?  Bad situation.

Michael Del Zotto just traded to Sharks, Canucks will 'pick up' 25% of his salary too!

Is Trevor Linden being paid still because they got rid of a guy who wanted to build Canucks through the draft slowly? While Benning undermined the President and convinced the spaghetti brothers he could get the team winning right now? IF they got rid of the Trevor thorn? Preventing Benning from doing some Matts Sundin and Mark Messier-like deals? Is there anyone left who believes the Canucks could beat any other team four out of seven in a playoff series?

One would almost think the Aquilini brothers are spending Daddy's money all this time and are not so smart after all? They seem to be handcuffed by the situation Benning has put them in. Is it all about Italian ego now?

Don't be taken in by the Pettersson impact, the team does little without him and Boesser needs someone who can pass the puck or receive it. Not likely among the soft players around him with the exception of workhorse Bo Horvat, who is being run to death trying to save Travis Green's job. And poor Travis can't sit the poor players without inciting Benning's wrath for embarrassing him!

And there is still doubt about Green's ego when he sat Boesser TWO games for his first NHL start! And gave the Sedins about 5 minutes per game (ego again) until he realized the Sedins were all he had until Pettersson arrived! And consider that instead of Benning calling the above mentioned fifth liners as Mentors to the young players, what effect the Sedins would have had on Pettersson's development?

And we hear that Quinn Hughes, already drafted but finishing up with his own team, (?) won't be signing anything until the end of the NHL season? Why? Benning said it is okay with him, but is it? Hughes is billed as the savior to the team, Is Quinn considering if he actually wants to play for Vancouver? Sometimes agents put that prospect to their client when something isn't quite right. And brother Jack is coming up for draft. The Hughes brothers want to play together and we all know that Benning is no Brian Burke to get them both.

Boesser has not signed a real contract yet, and is still on his entry level contract, and also his agent has let it be known that nothing will happen until season end. Does that make anyone nervous? Petterson will be on entry level another year. Do agents consider the management of the team while advising their clients? Is the toughness of the Canucks a factor if whether he will sign here? Is his future only a target with a coach who meekly looks away when his star is attacked? Can he look forward to injuries as part of his hockey life?
Pettersson is already being compared to Gretsky but maybe we need a winger to compare with Dave Semenko? Where is the gritty Matt Cook when we need him?
Would all that money draining from the Canucks' war chest influence the dollars being offered to their star players?


Benning thinks he can trade Edler for the end of the season, then get him back for next year again! If you discard a top player he tends to lose his loyalty to the team! And should ANY player on the Canucks make less than Loui?

Benning has ways of getting rid of the team owner's money. Do the Aquilinis have enough to keep him around yet another year when it is obvious his first GM job is way over his head? His mistake list is longer than the team roster! Does Travis Green have the kind of fire in his gut to run an NHL team? Does he get angry enough to take a personal penalty sometimes, for showing the league faults in not protecting their own entertainment stars? 'I didn't see what happened' is NOT an answer, it is an excuse.

Sorry, look at the team and the obvious answer is NO!

What's next? Fin cheering for the San Diego Chicken while billing the Canucks for Orca skin?



 






Monday, October 8, 2018

Bitches

 1 Year later and this tragedy is being faded into oblivion .... the problem is that every kid has a camera, and can post live action BEFORE the police, FBI, etc can confiscate their camera and start a coverup, (IF they are up to something) the other problem is that people can now review that action on social media, and make their own decisions about what happened, more often than not, that they disbelieve the official story. If you have time, go through this timeline, there is nothing incredible here,


Click Bitches link to read

Bitches: Shooting in Las Vegas; too many questions already. Motive seems to be elusive.  - One shooter or more? Police scanners reveal police we...